Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics

@article{Shema2014DoBC,
  title={Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics},
  author={Hadas Shema and J. Bar-Ilan and M. Thelwall},
  journal={Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology},
  year={2014},
  volume={65}
}
Journal‐based citations are an important source of data for impact indices. However, the impact of journal articles extends beyond formal scholarly discourse. Measuring online scholarly impact calls for new indices, complementary to the older ones. This article examines a possible alternative metric source, blog posts aggregated at ResearchBlogging.org, which discuss peer‐reviewed articles and provide full bibliographic references. Articles reviewed in these blogs therefore receive “blog… Expand
Blog Citations as Indicators of the Societal Impact of Research: Content Analysis of Social Sciences Blogs
This article analyzes motivations behind social sciences blog posts citing journal articles in order to find out whether blog citations are good indicators for the societal impact or benefits ofExpand
How is research blogged? A content analysis approach
TLDR
The results suggest that health research bloggers rarely self‐cite and that the vast majority of their blog posts (90%) include a general discussion of the issue covered in the article, with more than one quarter providing health‐related advice based on the article(s) covered. Expand
Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?
TLDR
The results show that citations from Wikipedia to articles are too rare for most research evaluation purposes, with only 5% of articles being cited in all fields, and so Wikipedia is not recommended for evaluations affecting stakeholder interests. Expand
A correlation comparison between Altmetric Attention Scores and citations for six PLOS journals
TLDR
The results show significant positive correlations between AAS and citations with varied strength for all articles and articles with AAS (or social media mentions), as well as for normalized AAS in the top 50%, top 25%, top 10%, and top 1% datasets. Expand
On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for finnish articles
TLDR
Examination of factors associated with future citation and altmetric counts to a paper shows that Journal impact factor and international collaboration are the two factors that significantly associate with increased citation counts and with all altmetrics scores. Expand
Web Citation Indicators for Wider Impact Assessment of Articles
  • K. Kousha
  • Sociology, Computer Science
  • Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators
  • 2019
TLDR
Different methods to capture web citations from a range of online sources via commercial search engines are explained and applications and limitations of web citation analysis for wider impact assessment of articles are discussed. Expand
Scientific vs. Public Attention: A Comparison of Top Cited Papers in WoS and Top Papers by Altmetric Score
Alternative metrics or altmetrics are article level metrics that have been used to quantify the attention given to scholarly papers in online fora or social media. In a way it was sought to replaceExpand
Can altmetric mentions predict later citations? A test of validity on data from ResearchGate and three social media platforms
PurposeThe main purpose of this study is to explore and validate the question “whether altmetric mentions can predict citations to scholarly articles”. The paper attempts to explore the nature andExpand
Measuring research impact: bibliometrics, social media, altmetrics, and the BJGP.
  • Janica Chavda, Anika Patel
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
  • 2016
TLDR
Alternative metrics (‘altmetrics’), first described by Priem and colleagues, is a term used to describe ‘web-based metrics for the impact of scholarly material with an emphasis on social media outlets as a source of data’. Expand
Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web
TLDR
Research about Google Scholar and Google Patents are reviewed, both of which can be used as sources of impact indicators for academic articles and methods to extract types of links and citations from the web as a whole are reviewed. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 76 REFERENCES
Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information
TLDR
It is found that ResearchBlogging.org bloggers show a preference for papers from high-impact journals and blog mostly about research in the life and behavioral sciences. Expand
Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
  • G. Eysenbach
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Journal of medical Internet research
  • 2011
TLDR
Tweets can predict highly cited articles within the first 3 days of article publication, and the proposed twimpact factor may be a useful and timely metric to measure uptake of research findings and to filter research findings resonating with the public in real time. Expand
Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference?
TLDR
This work compared bibliographic and Web citations to articles in 46 journals in library and information science to find that Web citations correlated significantly with both bibliographs listed in the Social Sciences Citation Index and the ISI's Journal Impact Factor. Expand
Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator
TLDR
An important conclusion is that in subject areas where wider types of intellectual impact indicators outside the WoS and Scopus databases are needed for research evaluation, IOI can be used to help monitor research performance. Expand
Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social Web
TLDR
Web presence widespread and diverse and social reference manager bookmarks are compared to Scopus and Web of Science citations; it is found that Mendeley covers more than 80% of sampled articles, and that MendEley bookmark counts are significantly correlated toScopus citation counts. Expand
Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
TLDR
Comparisons between citations and metric values for articles published at different times, even within the same year, can remove or reverse this association and so publishers and scientometricians should consider the effect of time when using altmetrics to rank articles. Expand
JASIST 2001–2010
TLDR
Examining article citations from 2001 through 2010, drawing on three major citation databases and readership counts finds alternative metrics such as mention counts in social media, Slideshare, Wikipedia and ReaderMeter can complement traditional citation analysis. Expand
Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement
This paper investigates whether CiteULike and Mendeley are useful for measuring scholarly influence, using a sample of 1,613 papers published in Nature and Science in 2007. Traditional citationExpand
Citation analysis of Library Trends
  • R. Jan
  • Geography, Computer Science
  • Webology
  • 2009
TLDR
Citation analysis of all the journal articles published in the Library Trends from 1994-2007 is carried out and it was found that 44.51 % print books are consulted by the authors and 0% e-books are accessed. Expand
How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations
TLDR
The volume of Twitter mentions is statistically correlated with arXiv downloads and early citations just months after the publication of a preprint, with a possible bias that favors highly mentioned articles. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...