Do anvil-using banded mongooses understand means–end relationships? A field experiment

  title={Do anvil-using banded mongooses understand means–end relationships? A field experiment},
  author={C. M{\"u}ller},
  journal={Animal Cognition},
  • C. Müller
  • Published 1 March 2010
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Animal Cognition
Tool use and the associated need to choose appropriate objects for a particular task are thought to have selected for specialized cognitive abilities such as means–end comprehension. Several studies on large-brained tool-using primates and birds have demonstrated understanding of causal relationships to some extent. However, a comprehensive appraisal of this hypothesis requires testing for means–end comprehension also in non-tool-users as well as in small-brained tool users. Moreover, the… Expand
Dogs learn to solve the support problem based on perceptual cues
Dogs' performance in the transfer tasks suggests that dogs can learn to solve the support problem based on perceptual cues, that they can quickly adopt new cues when old ones become unreliable, but also that some apparently inherent preferences are hard to overcome. Expand
Changing tides: ecological and historical perspectives on fish cognition.
The goal is to illustrate the necessity for basing cognitive investigations on the ecological and evolutionary context of the species at hand, and the importance of ecology and the environment in honing a range of sensory systems that allow fish to glean information and support informed decision-making. Expand
Report Imitation and Traditions in Wild Banded Mongooses
This experimental demonstration of a foragingtradition in wild mammals provides critical evidence to support previous accounts of traditions in nonhuman ani-mals based on distribution patterns of natural behaviors and shows that social learning need not lead to an increased behavioral homogeneity withing groups. Expand
Report in Wild Banded Mongooses
Evidence has accumulated in recent years indicating that traditions are not a unique feature of human societies but may be common in primates and some other mammals [1–8]. However, most documentedExpand
Imitation and Traditions in Wild Banded Mongooses
This experimental demonstration of a foraging tradition in wild mammals provides critical evidence to support previous accounts of traditions in nonhuman animals based on distribution patterns of natural behaviors and shows that social learning need not lead to an increased behavioral homogeneity within groups. Expand
Evolution of Cognitive Brains: Mammals
The number of cortical neurons appears to be a better predictor of intelligence but does not solve the paradox of elephants and cetaceans, which have at least several billion cortical neurons like the great apes, while being less intelligent. Expand
How do banded mongooses locate and select anvils for cracking encased food items?
The experiments suggest that mongooses employ simple rules of thumb that, in most cases, result in the selection of appropriate anvils, and that selection will favor the evolution of such rules of thumbs rather than a more generalized understanding of functional properties. Expand
How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology
Here, it is explained how an integration of comparative psychology and evolutionary biology will answer a host of questions regarding the phylogenetic distribution and history of cognitive traits, as well as the evolutionary processes that drove their evolution. Expand
Evolution of the Brain, Cognition, and Emotion in Vertebrates
Bony jawed vertebrates (Osteichthyes) are divided into two groups, rayfinned fish (Actinopterygii) and lobe-finned fish (Sarcopterygii). The tetrapod (including mammals and birds) is a group ofExpand
The 'other faunivory' revisited: Insectivory in human and non-human primates and the evolution of human diet.
  • W. McGrew
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Journal of human evolution
  • 2014
The role of invertebrates in the evolution of human diet has been under-studied by comparison with vertebrates and plants, but much insectivory in hominoids entails elementary technology used in extractive foraging, such as termite fishing by chimpanzees. Expand


Probing the limits of tool competence: Experiments with two non-tool-using species (Cercopithecus aethiops and Saguinus oedipus)
Results provide further evidence that tool-use may derive from domain-general, rather than domain-specific cognitive capacities that evolved for tool use per se, and whether these differences lie in the conceptual or motor domain. Expand
Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model
Findings from laboratory experiments and field observations of keas reveal surprising cognitive capacities in the physical domain that contribute to the ongoing debate on the distribution of higher cognitive skills in the animal kingdom by showing high levels of sensorimotor intelligence in animals that do not use tools. Expand
Investigating Physical Cognition in Rooks, Corvus frugilegus
The performance of non-tool-using rooks in a new paradigm, the two-trap tube task, is reported, providing suggestive evidence that rooks are capable of sophisticated physical cognition, if not through an understanding of unobservable forces, perhaps through rule abstraction. Expand
How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use?
Four tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were trained to choose from 2 hook-like tools, 1 of which successfully led to collecting food, whereas the other did not because of inappropriate spatialExpand
Chimpanzees fail to plan in an exchange task but succeed in a tool-using procedure
The best interpretation for the results is that chimpanzees can plan, however, planning was limited to the situation where the action to attain the future benefit only depended on a chimpanzee's own behavior. Expand
Tool selectivity in a non-primate, the New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides)
An experiment is presented showing that New Caledonian crows are able to choose tools of the appropriate size for a novel task, without trial-and-error learning. Expand
Can wild common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) solve the parallel strings task?
The undertaking of such tasks by common marmosets in situ probably provides a more reasonable representation of the levels of cognitive capacity expressed by this species in the wild than do laboratory-based studies of the task. Expand
Tools and brains in birds
It is shown that relative size of the neostriatum and whole brain distinguish the true and borderline categories in birds using tools to obtain food or water and that the complex cognitive processes involved in tool use may have repeatedly co-evolved with large brains in several orders of birds. Expand
Selection of tool diameter by New Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides
New Caledonian crows handling of tool diameter is examined, showing that when facing three loose sticks that were usable as tools, they preferred the thinnest one, and that they manufacture a tool of a suitable diameter from a tree branch according to the diameter of the hole through which the tool will be inserted. Expand
Great apes' (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) understanding of tool functional properties after limited experience.
Compared to most monkeys, great apes show a clear propensity for tool using and may not require as much experience to succeed on tool functionality tasks, but this question is investigated by presenting 171 apes with several tool-use problems without giving them initial training or familiarizing them with the test materials. Expand