Do-Gooder Derogation

@article{Minson2012DoGooderD,
  title={Do-Gooder Derogation},
  author={Julia A. Minson and Benoit Monin},
  journal={Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year={2012},
  volume={3},
  pages={200 - 207}
}
  • J. Minson, B. Monin
  • Published 2012
  • Psychology
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
Two studies document do-gooder derogation (the putting down of morally motivated others), by studying the reactions of meat eaters to vegetarians. In Study 1, 47% of participants freely associated negative terms with vegetarians and the valence of the words was negatively related to how much participants expected vegetarians to see themselves as morally superior to nonvegetarians. In Study 2, we manipulated the salience of anticipated moral reproach by varying whether participants reported… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations.
TLDR
It is argued that individuals expect those high initimate power to engage in moral objection, but expect those low in legitimate power to comply with ethically questionable practices, and proposed that these contrasting role expectations influence the extent to which moral objectors are perceived as warm and subjected to social sanctions. Expand
Attitudes toward Vegans and Vegetarians: The Role of Anticipated Moral Reproach and Dissonance
This study attempted to determine if anticipated moral reproach and cognitive dissonance explain negative attitudes toward vegans and vegetarians, and if vegans are subject to more negative attitudesExpand
Reactions to morally motivated deviance
People value morality in themselves and others. They want to be moral and good individuals, associate themselves with others who share their moral values, and belong to moral groups. As an ironicExpand
Do-gooder derogation in children: the social costs of generosity
TLDR
By middle childhood, coming up short in comparison with a peer can decrease one’s liking for a generous individual, and the effects of social comparison on their preferences are investigated. Expand
When principled deviance becomes moral threat: Testing alternative mechanisms for the rejection of moral rebels
Monin, Sawyer, and Marquez (2008) demonstrated that a rebel who refused to participate in a racially prejudiced decision task was derogated by actors who had themselves taken part in the task, butExpand
Good, but Not a Goody Two-Shoes: Self-Presentation Concerns of Appearing Overly Moral
COWGILL, COLLEEN M., M.S., August 2017, Psychology Good, but Not a Goody Two-Shoes: Self-Presentation Cocnerns of Appearing Overly Moral Director of Thesis: Kimberly M. Rios People are generallyExpand
Meat, morals, and masculinity
TLDR
In two between-subject studies, people's perceptions of others who follow omnivorous and vegetarian diets are investigated, controlling for the perceived healthiness of the diets in question. Expand
Evaluating Others If They Stand Up for Their Moral Convictions, and Evaluating Ourselves If We Don't Stand Up
Acting on one’s moral principles is not always easy. Upholding one’s moral beliefs may run counter to one’s social environment or situational demands. It may often cause people to remain silent onExpand
Moral Intuition or Moral Disengagement? Cognitive Science Weighs in on the Animal Ethics Debate
In this paper I problematize the use of appeals to the common intuitions people have about the morality of our society’s current treatment of animals in order to defend that treatment. I do so byExpand
A hero for the outgroup, a black sheep for the ingroup: Societal perceptions of those who confront discrimination
Abstract Confrontation of discrimination can be seen as a form of morally courageous behavior, however those who engage in it presumably risk societal backlash. In three experiments, we examinedExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES
The rejection of moral rebels: resenting those who do the right thing.
TLDR
Four studies suggest that rebels are resented when their implicit reproach threatens the positive self-image of individuals who did not rebel. Expand
In a very different voice: unmasking moral hypocrisy.
TLDR
Across 3 small studies, 80 female undergraduates were confronted with the dilemma of deciding whom-themselves or another research participant-to assign to a positive consequences task, leaving the other to do a dull, boring task, suggesting motivation to appear moral yet still benefit oneself. Expand
Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust
We describe a rather common process that we call moralization, in which objects or activities that were previously morally neutral acquire a moral component. Moralization converts preferences intoExpand
Moral hypocrisy, moral inconsistency, and the struggle for moral integrity.
If future archaeologists unearthed an untitled social psychology textbook, its cover eaten by discerning worms, they would have to figure out what social psychologists studied from the papers theyExpand
Holier than me? Threatening Social Comparison in the Moral Domain
This short review analyzes the specificity of upward social comparison in the moral domain, suggesting that it blends Festinger’s (1954) distinction between opinions and abilities. We discussExpand
The self-importance of moral identity.
TLDR
Six studies using adolescents, university students, and adults measured the associations among the self-importance of moral identity, moral cognitions, and behavior to consider moral self-conceptions in explaining moral conduct. Expand
Envy and Schadenfreude
To test the hypothesis that Schadenfreude, pleasure at the suffering of others, will result when an envied person experiences a misfortune, envy was created in subjects by asking them to watch aExpand
The social psychology of morality : exploring the causes of good and evil
Humans are universally concerned with good and evil, although one person's "evil" can be another person's "good." How do individuals arrive at decisions about what is right and what is wrong? And howExpand
Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others
The authors argue that self-image maintenance processes play an important role in stereotyping and prejudice. Three studies demonstrated that when individuals evaluated a member of a stereotypedExpand
Personality, identity, and character: explorations in moral psychology
how the arguments for moral and other forms of relativism can themselves be the subject of critical reflection, unless it can also be shown how ethical and meta-ethical inquiries can go somewhereExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...