Divine foreknowledge and Newcomb's paradox

  title={Divine foreknowledge and Newcomb's paradox},
  author={W. Craig},
  • W. Craig
  • Published 1987
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophia
ConclusionNewcomb's Paradox thus serves as an illustrative vindication of the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom. A proper understanding of the counterfactual conditionals involved enables us to see that the pastness of God's knowledge serves neither to make God's beliefs counterfactually closed nor to rob us of genuine freedom. It is evident that our decisions determine God's past beliefs about those decisions and do so without invoking an objectionable backward causation… Expand
Incompatibilist Alternative Possibilities
This dissertation has two primary aims. The first aim is to defend the position that the alternative possibilities that are required for basic desert moral responsibility are incompatible with causalExpand
Foreknowledge, fate and freedom
“Foreknowledge, Fate and Freedom” is concerned with diagnosing and debunking a pervasive and prevalent folk intuition: that a foreknown future would be problematically, and freedom-hinderingly,Expand
Newcomb’s Problem
The first three paradoxes revolved around questions of what would be factually true, given certain assumptions. The rest concern questions of what someone called the player should do given certainExpand
Infallibility in the Newcomb Problem
It is intuitively attractive to think that it makes a difference in Newcomb’s problem whether or not the predictor is infallible, in the sense of being certainly actually correct. This paper arguesExpand
Newcomb's Paradox and Neuroeconomics: Proposal of an Experimental Investigation
In this paper we propose a version of a game-theoretic problem known as the Newcomb's Paradox. The version offers possibilities for an experimental investigation. Such experiments would make use ofExpand
Call for a Non-Euclidean , Post-Cantorian Theology
Theology, which may be defined as a systematic study of God and other doctrines of the Bible, has been studied for millennia, with volumes and volumes of literature that has been written over manyExpand
Evidence, Decision and Causality
Introduction 1. Savage 2. EDT and CDT 3. Causalist objections to CDT 4. Realistic cases 5. Deterministic cases 6. Quantum-mechanical cases 7. The standard Newcomb case 8. 'The ultimate contingency'.
Dear author,
In the literature, the outcome of contests is either interpreted as win 1 probabilities or as shares of the prize. With this in mind, we examine two approaches 2 to contest success functions (CSFs).Expand
North American Philosophical Publications
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology andExpand


Foreknowledge: Nelson Pike and Newcomb's problem
The problem of foreknowledge and freedom presents a challenge to the defender of traditional Western theism. Nelson Pike has argued that the existence of an essentially omniscient God who possessesExpand
On Ockham’s Way Out
In Part I, I present two traditional arguments for the incompatibility of divine foreknowledge with human freedom; the first of these is clearly fallacious; but the second, the argument from theExpand
Newcomb's Paradox and the Direction of Causation
Newcomb's paradox was first presented by Robert Nozick and has been discussed by a considerable number of writers. You are playing a game with a Being who seems to have extraordinary predictiveExpand
Newcomb's Paradox Revisited
This paper attempts to provide a solution to the Newcomb Problem, which was first presented in Nozick [1969]. The author suggested there a solution of his own, with which he admitted to beingExpand
out to Dorling in correspondence that his formal rendering of this is inadequate and leads to paradox in addition to generating a formal fallacy at a later point in the proof. Dorling's formulationExpand
Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utility
We begin with a rough theory of rational decision-making. In the first place, rational decision-making involves conditional propositions: when a person weighs a major decision, it is rational for himExpand
Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow
Today I am typing words on a page. Suppose today were different. Suppose I were typing different words. Then plainly tomorrow would be different also; for instance, different words would appear onExpand
The Unpredictability of Free Choices*
  • G. Schlesinger
  • Computer Science
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1974
Now the Predictor is a most remarkable person; on thousands of occasions before he has under all sorts of circumstances predicted correctly and on no occasion has he predicted wrongly the choices ofExpand
Newcomb’s Problem and Two Principles of Choice
A being in whose power to predict your choices you have enormous confidence leads you to believe that almost certainly this being’s prediction about your choice in the situation to be discussed will be correct. Expand
Newcomb’s Problem, Dominance and Expected Utility
Imagine that you are faced with the following predicament. Before you are two boxes, B 1 and B 2. B 1 definitely contains $1,000, while B2 contains either $1,000,000 or nothing. There are just twoExpand