Dividing Attention Without Alternation or Automaticity

@inproceedings{Hirst1980DividingAW,
  title={Dividing Attention Without Alternation or Automaticity},
  author={William Hirst and Elizabeth S. Spelke and Celia C. Reaves and George Caharack and Ulric Neisser},
  year={1980}
}
Spelke, Hirst, and Neisser trained two subjects to copy unrelated words at dictation as they read and understood stories. The subjects' success was interpreted as evidence against the hypothesis of a fixed attentional capacity or limited cognitive resources; instead, it was hypothesized, attention is a skill that improves with practice. However, other explanations of these results can be proposed. The present research addressed two such counterhypotheses: that capacity may be alternated between… CONTINUE READING
54 Citations
28 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 54 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 28 references

Effect of posthypnotic dissociation on the performance of interfering tasks

  • J. H. Stevenson
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
  • 1976
1 Excerpt

On data-limited and resource-limited processes

  • Norman, A D., D. G. Bobrow
  • Cognitive Psychology,
  • 1975

The locus and role of attention in memory systems

  • R. M. Shiffrin
  • 1975
1 Excerpt

The role of semantic and syntactic constraints in the memorization of English sentences

  • L. Marks, G. A. Miller
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • 1974

Decision and stress

  • D. E. Broadbent
  • 1971
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…