Divergent Perspectives on Expert Disagreement: Preliminary Evidence from Climate Science, Climate Policy, Astrophysics, and Public Opinion

@article{Beebe2018DivergentPO,
  title={Divergent Perspectives on Expert Disagreement: Preliminary Evidence from Climate Science, Climate Policy, Astrophysics, and Public Opinion},
  author={James R. Beebe and Maria Baghramian and Luke O'c. Drury and Finnur Dells{\'e}n},
  journal={Environmental Communication},
  year={2018},
  volume={13},
  pages={35 - 50}
}
ABSTRACT We report the results of an exploratory study that examines the judgments of climate scientists, climate policy experts, astrophysicists, and non-experts (N = 3367) about the factors that contribute to the creation and persistence of disagreement within climate science and astrophysics and about how one should respond to expert disagreement. We found that, as compared to non-experts, climate experts believe that within climate science (i) there is less disagreement about climate change… 

Disagreement in science: introduction to the special issue

Recent work in philosophy has seen an explosion of interest in the phenomenon of peer disagreement, i.e. situations inwhich equallywell informed and competent agents have contrary beliefs on a given

Role Perceptions in Climate Science Communication

ABSTRACT Climate science communication holds the potential to stimulate a renegotiation of the conventional roles in the science-society interface. As climate science is conducted within a context of

Why do experts disagree? The development of a taxonomy

People are increasingly exposed to conflicting health information and must navigate this information to make numerous decisions, such as which foods to consume, a process many find difficult.

Skepticism Motivated: On the Skeptical Import of Motivated Reasoning

Abstract Empirical work on motivated reasoning suggests that our judgments are influenced to a surprising extent by our wants, desires, and preferences (Kahan 2016; Lord, Ross, and Lepper 1979;

Integrating media studies concepts into theories of the policy process: Enhancing the role of media as a climate service in the wake of recurring extreme weather events

Theories of agenda-setting, punctuated equilibrium and framing undergird theories of the policy process. These theories presume that public attention to extreme weather events would result in an

Epidemiological versusmeteorological forecasts: Best practice for linkingmodels to policymaking

Weather forecasts, climate change projections, and epidemiological predictions all represent domains that are using forecast data to take early action for risk management. However, the methods and

Search for Meaning

  • J. R. Royce
  • Philosophy
    Creative (Climate) Communications
  • 2019
insistent quest for the meaning of things. The question is one that faces "everyman" from the child's first awareness of the mystery of life to the adult's apprehension of the mystery of death. As

How We Know What We Know

  • S. Crawford
  • Physics
    Creative (Climate) Communications
  • 2019
Steve Crawford explains how astronomers use spectroscopy to unlock the secrets of the Universe.

Disagreement in science: introduction to the special issue

Recent work in philosophy has seen an explosion of interest in the phenomenon of peer disagreement, i.e. situations inwhich equallywell informed and competent agents have contrary beliefs on a given

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 32 REFERENCES

Expert credibility in climate change

An extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data is used to show that 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Meteorologists' Views About Global Warming: A Survey of American Meteorological Society Professional Members

Meteorologists and other atmospheric science experts are playing important roles in helping society respond to climate change. However, members of this professional community are not unanimous in

Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming

The consensus that humans are causing recent global warming is shared by 90%–100% of publishing climate scientists according to six independent studies by co-authors of this paper. Those results are

The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change

Policy-makers and the public who are not members of the relevant research community have had to form opinions about the reality of global climate change on the basis of often conflicting descriptions

Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans' Climate Change Beliefs, Attitudes, Policy Preferences, and Actions

In September and October of 2008 a research team from Yale and George Mason Universities conducted a nationally representative survey of 2,164 American adults. Survey participants were asked about

The Polls—Trends Twenty Years of Public Opinion about Global Warming

Over the past 20 years, there have been dozens of news organization, academic, and nonpartisan public opinion surveys on global warming, yet there exists no authoritative summary of their collective

Reply to Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’

We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991‐2011 matching the

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature

We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the

Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans' Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in April 2013

This report is based on findings from a nationally representative survey – Climate Change in the American Mind – conducted by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason