Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay.

@article{Wells2003DistortedRE,
  title={Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay.},
  author={G. L. Wells and Elizabeth Anne Olson and Steve D Charman},
  journal={Journal of experimental psychology. Applied},
  year={2003},
  volume={9 1},
  pages={
          42-52
        }
}
Participant-witnesses viewed a crime video and attempted to identify the culprit from a culprit-absent lineup. The 253 mistaken-identification eyewitnesses were randomly given confirming, disconfirming, or no feedback regarding their identifications. Feedback was immediate or delayed 48 hr, and measures were immediate or delayed 48 hr. Confirming, but not disconfirming, feedback led to distortions of eyewitnesses' recalled confidence, amount of attention paid during witnessing, goodness of view… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 CITATIONS, ESTIMATED 36% COVERAGE

75 Citations

0510'06'09'12'15'18
Citations per Year
Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 75 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES

Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience

  • G. L. Wells, A. L. Bradfield
  • Journal of Applied Psychology,
  • 1998
Highly Influential
5 Excerpts

Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.)

  • J. Cohen
  • 1988
Highly Influential
2 Excerpts

Eyewitness identification confidence

  • G. L. Wells, E. A. Olson, S. D. Charman
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science,
  • 2002

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…