• DOI:10.3758/s13421-013-0383-9
• Corpus ID: 3452170

Distinct processes shape flashbulb and event memories

@article{Tinti2014DistinctPS,
  title={Distinct processes shape flashbulb and event memories},
  author={Carla Tinti and Susanna Schmidt and Silvia Testa and Linda J. Levine},
  journal={Memory \& Cognition},
  year={2014},
  volume={42},
  pages={539 - 551}
}

• C. Tinti, Susanna Schmidt, +1 author L. Levine
• Published 12 November 2013
• Psychology
• Memory & Cognition

In the present study, we examined the relation between memory for a consequential and emotional event and memory for the circumstances in which people learned about that event, known as flashbulb memory. We hypothesized that these two types of memory have different determinants and that event memory is not necessarily a direct causal determinant of flashbulb memory. Italian citizens (N = 352) described their memories of Italy’s victory in the 2006 Football World Cup Championship after a delay of 18 months. Structural equation modeling showed that flashbulb memory and event memory could be clearly differentiated and were determined by two separate pathways. In the first pathway, importance predicted emotional intensity, which, in turn, predicted the frequency of overt and covert rehearsal. Rehearsal was the only direct determinant of vivid and detailed flashbulb memories. In the second pathway, importance predicted rehearsal by media exposure, which enhanced the accuracy and certainty of event memory. Event memory was also enhanced by prior knowledge. These results have important implications for the debate concerning whether the formation of flashbulb memory and event memory involve different processes and for understanding how flashbulb memory can be simultaneously so vivid and so error-prone.