Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion

  title={Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion},
  author={Grzegorz Kr{\'o}liczak and Priscilla Heard and Melvyn A. Goodale and RICHARD L. Gregory},
  journal={Brain Research},

Figures from this paper

Action without perception in human vision
  • M. Goodale
  • Biology, Psychology
    Cognitive neuropsychology
  • 2008
A full understanding of the integrated nature of visually guided behaviour will require that the nature of the interactions and information exchange that occur between these two streams of visual processing are specified.
Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness.
It is concluded that visuomotor mechanisms encapsulated in the left hemisphere play a crucial role in the visual control of action and that this hemispheric specialization evolved independently of handedness.
On the perceptual/motor dissociation: a review of concepts, theory, experimental paradigms and data interpretations.
The reviewed evidence is not meant to refute or validate the hypothesis of a perceptual-motor dissociation, but to show that, beyond its self-evidence, such dissociation is difficult if not impossible to test.
Perception-action dissociations depend on the luminance contrast of the stimuli.
The results suggest that dissociations between perceptual and motor responses can be explained by a single-signal model involving differential thresholds for perception and action that are specifically modulated as a function of both the requirements of the task and the contrast level of the stimuli.
Influence of near threshold visual distractors on perceptual detection and reaching movements.
The results of the present study are compatible with the theory proposing that perceptual and motor decisions are based on a common signal but emerge from a contrast dependent fixed threshold for motor responses and a variable context dependent criterion for perceptual responses.
Action Rules: Why the Visual Control of Reaching and Grasping is Not Always Influenced by Perceptual Illusions
Differences in the timing and metrics of the two vision systems suggest that some of the critical components of the encapsulated (bottom – up) systems that mediate the visual control of skilled reaching and grasping movements are lateralised to the left hemisphere.
Conscious vision guides motor action—rarely
According to Milner and Goodale’s dual visual systems (DVS) theory, a division obtains between visual consciousness and motor action, in that the visual system producing conscious vision (the ventral
Grasping and Pointing - Visual Conflict and Interference.
A perceptual task of conflict or interference was used to find if the effects resulting from perceptual conflicts or interferences would affect participants' grasping and pointing and indicated that, to some degree, perceptual conflict affects action processing.
Nonconscious Control of Voice Intensity During Vocalization
The hypothesis tested in this paper is that the voice intensity is tracked and controlled by an auditory motor system and the results of this control are used for nonconciously correct the vocal production.
The dorsal stream and the visual horizon
Today many philosophers of mind accept that the two cortical streams of visual processing in humans can be distinguished in terms of conscious experience. The ventral stream is thought to produce


A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them
The quantitative analyses demonstrate strikingly accurate guidance of hand and finger movements directed at the very objects whose qualities she fails to perceive and suggest that the neural substrates for the visual perception of object qualities such as shape, orientation and size are distinct from those underlying the use of those qualities in the control of manual skills.
When does action resist visual illusions?
  • N. Bruno
  • Psychology, Biology
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2001
Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation
It is shown that the Ebbinghaus illusion affects grasping to the same extent as perception and that the grasp effects cannot be accounted for by non-perceptual obstacle avoidance mechanisms as has recently been suggested.
Separate visual pathways for perception and action
Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.
  • S. Glover, P. Dixon
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
  • 2001
The authors argue that reaching trajectories are planned and initiated through a context-dependent representation but are corrected on-line through acontext-independent representation.
Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action.
Evidence is presented that suggests that the critical distinction is not that of reaching and judgment but of relative and absolute perception, and that humans possess 2 distinct visual systems that subserves perceptual judgment and 1 that mediates visually controlled action.
Knowledge in perception and illusion.
  • R. Gregory
  • Psychology
    Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
  • 1997
Visual illusions can provide evidence of object knowledge and working rules for vision, but only when the phenomena are explained and classified, which makes it hard to define 'illusion'.
Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision
This slim volume is based on the authors’ investigations over a period of 15 years of a patient (“Dee Fletcher”) who developed visual form agnosia following a freak accident in which she suffered carbon monoxide poisoning, and concludes that visuomotor control is viewpoint-dependent (egocentric), uses real-world metrics, and has a very short time constant.