• DOI:10.3758/BF03196871
• Corpus ID: 18060961

Dissociating familiarity from recollection using rote rehearsal

@article{Dobbins2004DissociatingFF,
  title={Dissociating familiarity from recollection using rote rehearsal},
  author={Ian G. Dobbins and Neal E. A. Kroll and Andrew P. Yonelinas},
  journal={Memory \& Cognition},
  year={2004},
  volume={32},
  pages={932-944}
}

• I. Dobbins, N. Kroll, A. Yonelinas
• Published 1 September 2004
• Psychology
• Memory & Cognition

Recollection-based recognition memory judgments benefit greatly from effortful elaborative encoding, whereas familiarity-based judgments are much less sensitive to such manipulations. In this study, we have examined whether rote rehearsal under divided attention might produce the opposite dissociation, benefiting familiarity more than recollection. Subjects rehearsed word pairs during the “distractor” phase of a working memory span task, and were then given a surprise memory test for the distractor items at the end of the experiment. Experiment 1 demonstrated that increasing rehearsal elevated the recognition rate for intact and rearranged pairs, but neither associative recognition accuracy nor implicit fragment completion benefited from rehearsal. The results suggest that rote rehearsal leads to a greater increase in familiarity than in recollection, and that the increase in observed familiarity cannot be attributed to effects of repetition priming. In Experiment 2, we tested item recognition with the remember/know procedure, and the results supported the conclusions of Experiment 1. Moreover, a signal detection model of remember/know performance systematically overpredicted rehearsal increases in remember rates, and this worsened when high-rehearsal items were assumed to be more variable in strength. The results suggest that rote rehearsal can dissociate familiarity from recollection at the time of encoding and that item recognition cannot be fully accommodated within a one-dimensional signal detection model.