Dismantling the Oil Wars Myth

@article{Meierding2016DismantlingTO,
  title={Dismantling the Oil Wars Myth},
  author={Emily Meierding},
  journal={Security Studies},
  year={2016},
  volume={25},
  pages={258 - 288}
}
This article argues that, contrary to the assumptions of international relations scholars, policymakers, and the general public, states do not engage in oil wars. A twofold strategy is employed to support this assertion. First, the article scrutinizes the logical underpinnings of oil war claims, arguing that proponents have underestimated the obstacles to seizing and exploiting foreign resources and, consequently, exaggerated the likelihood of oil wars. Second, the article examines four… 
Do Countries Fight Over Oil
Meierding challenges the popular belief that countries fight over oil resources by demonstrating that most militarized incidents in petroleum-endowed territories are merely ‘oil spats’: mild, brief,
Oil and Security: The Necessity of Political Economy
Many international conflicts are in some way related to energy, ever since oil became the world's preeminent strategic commodity in the early 20th century. I argue that the most important
The Economics of War and Peace
This chapter identifies important changes and continuities taking place in the economics of war and peace. While the economic benefits of conquest have shrunk, there remain many incentives for states
The Oil Wars Myth: Petroleum and the Causes of International Conflict
Citation: George Fujii. H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable on Black Gold and Blackmail: Oil and Great Power Politics and on The Oil Wars Myth: Petroleum and the Causes of International Conflict. H-Diplo.
When It Is Not “Business as Usual”: Petro-states and International Conflict
While there is increasing recognition that petrostates are more militaristic than their counterparts, it remains unclear why economic dependence on oil revenue leads to such belligerence. In this
Productive Pacifists: The Rise of Production-Oriented States and Decline of Profit-Motivated Conquest
Scholarship suggests the profits from conquest have decreased over time. Given this, why were some states faster to abandon profit-motivated conquest, and why are some still seeking wealth from
Crude Calculations: Productivity and the Profitability of Conquest
Abstract For many centuries, conquest was commonplace, and its attractiveness was central to the character of international politics. Why has it declined? Existing theories cannot explain why
Swinging Shale: Shale Oil, the Global Oil Market, and the Geopolitics of Oil
  • Inwook Kim
  • Geology
    International Studies Quarterly
  • 2020
Is shale oil “revolutionizing” the global oil market and the geopolitics of oil? If so, how? While two aspects of the shale boom—a new source of supply and a cause for the price collapse in
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 50 REFERENCES
The Petroleum Paradox: Oil, Coercive Vulnerability, and Great Power Behavior
Why do great powers fear oil coercion, and what explains the strategies they adopt to protect themselves from it? The paper identifies three types of anticipatory strategies great powers pursue:
Energy Alarmism: The Myths that Make Americans Worry about Oil (PA 589)
Many Americans have lost confidence in their country's energy security over the past several years. Because the United States is a net oil importer, and a substantial one at that, concerns about
A War for Oil in the Chaco, 1932–1935
  • S. Cote
  • Political Science
    Environmental History
  • 2013
Beginning in the late 1920s, Bolivia's growing need for petroleum to fuel its mining sector and urban centers led the country on a policy of expansion into the Chaco Boreal, a torrid expanse claimed
Iraq's decisions to go to war, 1980 and 1990
The driving force behind Saddam Husayn's decisions to go to war in 1980 and 1990 was his belief that foreign forces were working to destabilize the Ba `th Party regime in Iraq. Saddam believed that
Making the Conspiracy Theorist a Prophet: Covert Action and the Contours of United States–Iraq Relations
Convert action is an inherently fraught undertaking. It can produce important diplomatic or strategic gains at a relatively low price, but it can also result in substantial “blowback” when it fails
The Origins of the Pacific War
“Whom the Gods would destroy they first make mad,” declared Congressman Hamilton Fish on December 8, 1941, the day after infamy. Minutes before, Franklin D. Roosevelt had asked Congress to declare
What is Diplomatic History
The practice of international history, that is of the history of relations between nation states, began in the nineteenth century with the publication, first, of the great series on international
The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force
  • M. Zacher
  • Economics
    International Organization
  • 2001
Scholars and observers of the international system often comment on the decreasing importance of international boundaries as a result of the growth of international economic and social exchanges,
Deterrence and Compellence in the Gulf, 1990-91: A Failed or Impossible Task?
TLDR
The intriguing question is whether, if the United States had tried seriously to deter Iraq before it invaded Kuwait, deterrence would have succeeded in preventing the attack.
The road to Pearl Harbor
The European war and U.S. neutrality The several months between September 1939, when Germany invaded Poland, and the spring of 1940, when the target of the attack shifted to Western Europe, have been
...
...