Disagreement and the division of epistemic labor

@article{Hallsson2018DisagreementAT,
  title={Disagreement and the division of epistemic labor},
  author={Bj{\o}rn G. Hallsson and K. Kappel},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2018},
  volume={197},
  pages={2823-2847}
}
  • Bjørn G. Hallsson, K. Kappel
  • Published 2018
  • Sociology, Computer Science
  • Synthese
  • In this article we discuss what we call the deliberative division of epistemic labor. We present evidence that the human tendency to engage in motivated reasoning in defense of our beliefs can facilitate the occurrence of divisions of epistemic labor in deliberations among people who disagree. We further present evidence that these divisions of epistemic labor tend to promote beliefs that are better supported by the evidence. We show that promotion of these epistemic benefits stands in tension… CONTINUE READING
    2 Citations

    Topics from this paper

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 109 REFERENCES
    The Rationality of Belief and Some Other Propositional Attitudes
    • 98
    • PDF
    Epistemic Decision Theory
    • 67
    • PDF
    Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions
    • 105
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Reasonable Disagreement and Rational Group Inquiry
    • 14
    The Division of Epistemic Labor
    • 34
    • PDF
    A Defence of Epistemic Consequentialism
    • 34
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    A pluralistic account of epistemic rationality
    • M. Kopec
    • Philosophy, Computer Science
    • Synthese
    • 2017
    • 5
    • Highly Influential
    Entitlement and rationality
    • C. Jenkins
    • Philosophy, Computer Science
    • Synthese
    • 2006
    • 68
    Disagreement Without Transparency: Some Bleak Thoughts
    • 28
    Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy
    • 189
    • PDF