Direkter und indirekter „Genitiv“

@article{Schenkel1963DirekterUI,
  title={Direkter und indirekter „Genitiv“},
  author={Wolfgang Schenkel},
  journal={Zeitschrift f{\"u}r {\"A}gyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde},
  year={1963},
  volume={88},
  pages={58 - 66}
}
  • Wolfgang Schenkel
  • Published 1963
  • Art
  • Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde

Direkter und indirekter Genitiv im Älteren Ägyptisch nach dem Zeugnis der Sargtexte

Summary Based on the Coffin Text corpus, the use of the two genitive constructions (direct vs. indirect) of Earlier Egyptian is investigated. It is argued that there is no functional difference

“Genitive” possessive constructions in Égyptien de tradition: Compound construction vs. of-construction

This article mainly explores the usage of two attributive possessive constructions that are traditionally labeled the “Direct Genitive” and “Indirect Genitive” (in both cases, the notion “genitive”

Possessive Constructions in Egyptian and Coptic. Distribution, Definiteness, and the Construct State Phenomenon

Abstract In this paper, the distribution of Coptic possessive constructions is defined in terms of syntactic constraints: the construction involving the linking element n- requires the obligatory

Possessive Constructions in Egyptian and Coptic

  • Linguistics
  • 2010
The distribution of Coptic possessive constructions can be defined purely in terms of syntactic constraints in which the definiteness of the possessed noun will have a decisive role. In relation to a