Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up.

@article{Wassell2000DirectCI,
  title={Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up.},
  author={Robert W Wassell and Angus Willian Gilmour Walls and John Francis McCabe},
  journal={Journal of dentistry},
  year={2000},
  volume={28 6},
  pages={375-82}
}
OBJECTIVES To determine at 5 year follow-up the failure rate, wear rates and other aspects of clinical performance of direct composite inlays compared with conventional composite restorations placed incrementally. METHODS 100 matched pairs of restorations were originally entered into the trial. Each pair consisted of a direct composite inlay and a conventional composite restoration made from the same material. At 5 years it was possible to recall 65 pairs, of which 54 were complete. Clinical… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
33 Citations
0 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 33 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…