Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops

@article{Rowe2005DifficultiesIE,
  title={Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops},
  author={Gene Rowe and T. Horlick-Jones and J. Walls and N. Pidgeon},
  journal={Public Understanding of Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={14},
  pages={331 - 352}
}
  • Gene Rowe, T. Horlick-Jones, +1 author N. Pidgeon
  • Published 2005
  • Sociology
  • Public Understanding of Science
  • In the realm of risk management, and policy-making more generally, “public engagement” is often advocated as an antidote to pathologies associated with traditional methods of policy-making, and associated deficit-model-driven communication strategies. The actual benefits of public engagement are, however, difficult to establish without thorough evaluation of specific engagement processes. Unfortunately, rigorous evaluation is difficult, and, perhaps for this reason, it has rarely been… CONTINUE READING
    Stakeholder engagement in food risk management
    • 32
    Deliberating Competence
    • 164
    From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy
    • 78

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 55 REFERENCES
    Evaluating Environmental Public Participation: Methodological Questions
    • 187
    A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms
    • 1,310
    • PDF
    Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation
    • 1,759
    • PDF
    Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference
    • 245
    Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda
    • 729