Difficulties Coding Dermatological Disorders Using the ICD-10: The DIADERM Study.

@article{GonzlezLpez2018DifficultiesCD,
  title={Difficulties Coding Dermatological Disorders Using the ICD-10: The DIADERM Study.},
  author={G Gonz{\'a}lez-L{\'o}pez and Ignacio Garc{\'i}a-Doval and Alejandro Molina-Leyva and Miguel A Descalzo-Gallego and Rosa Taberner and Yolanda Gilaberte and Agust{\'i}n Buend{\'i}a-Eisman and Pablo Fern{\'a}ndez-Pe{\~n}as},
  journal={Actas dermo-sifiliograficas},
  year={2018},
  volume={109 10},
  pages={
          893-899
        }
}
2 Citations

Figures and Tables from this paper

Prediction of skin disease using a new cytological taxonomy based on cytology and pathology with deep residual learning method
TLDR
The results showed that the new taxonomy developed based on cytology and pathology has an overall better performance on predictive effect of skin disease than the ICD-10 on Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue.
Deep Learning Approaches for Prognosis of Automated Skin Disease
TLDR
A skin disease classification system using MobileNetV2 and LSTM is developed for accuracy in skin disease forecasting is the primary aim while ensuring excellent efficiency in storing complete state information for exact forecasts.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES
Reaching multidisciplinary consensus on classification of anaphylaxis for the eleventh revision of the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11)
TLDR
The building process used for the pioneering “Anaphylaxis” subsection of ICD-11 in which it aimed for transparency as recommended in the I CD-11 revision guidelines is reported, and for the first time, anaphyl axis is now properly classified and has attained greater visibility within ICD.
Constructing a classification of hypersensitivity/allergic diseases for ICD‐11 by crowdsourcing the allergist community
TLDR
A high‐level complex structure of classification for hypersensitivity/allergic diseases has been constructed and the model proposed has been presented to the WHO groups in charge of the ICD revision.
Will Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine‐Clinical Terms improve our understanding of the disease burden posed by allergic disorders?
TLDR
There is a role for allergy experts, working in conjunction with government agencies and professional bodies, to determine a recommended set of codes, which will obviate some of the inevitable challenges raised by a very fluid coding structure for those wishing to undertake secondary analysis of health care datasets.
Undernotification of anaphylaxis deaths in Brazil due to difficult coding under the ICD‐10
TLDR
Brazilian mortality data were used as a case study to call attention to the inadequacy of the ICD‐10 for the measurement of anaphylaxis deaths.
The World Health Organization.
TLDR
The data and methods used to produce the Version 2 estimates of burden of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for the year 2000 are summarized and the long-term sequelae of both preeclampsia or eClampsia are not well evaluated.
The increasing incidence of frontal fibrosing alopecia. In search of triggering factors
TLDR
The concept that the increasing numbers of patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia may result solely from the growing awareness of medical professionals and patients finds no support in available data.
The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms.
TLDR
The revision clarifies the diagnosis and management of lesions at the very early stages of lymphomagenesis, refines the diagnostic criteria for some entities, details the expanding genetic/molecular landscape of numerous lymphoid neoplasms and their clinical correlates, and refers to investigations leading to more targeted therapeutic strategies.
...
1
2
3
...