Differing observations on the landing of the rod into the slot

@article{Iyer2006DifferingOO,
  title={Differing observations on the landing of the rod into the slot},
  author={Chandru Iyer and G. M. Prabhu},
  journal={American Journal of Physics},
  year={2006},
  volume={74},
  pages={998-1001}
}
In the usual rod and slot paradox a rod falls into a slot due to gravity. Many thought experiments have been conducted where the presence of gravity is eliminated with the rod and slot approaching each other along a line joining their centers. In these experiments the line of motion is not parallel to the axis of the rod or the slot. We consider the cases for which the rod falls into the slot and the rod does not fall into the slot, each from the perspective of the co-moving frames of the rod… Expand

Figures from this paper

A relativistic trolley paradox
We present an apparent paradox within the special theory of relativity, involving a trolley with relativistic velocity and its rolling wheels. Two solutions are given, both making clear the physicalExpand
A Light Clock Satisfying the Clock Hypothesis of Special Relativity.
The design of the FMEL, a floor-mirrored Einstein–Langevin 'light clock', is introduced. The clock provides a physically intuitive manner to calculate and visualize the time dilation effects for aExpand
Comment on ‘Analysis of scissors cutting paper at super luminal speeds’
In a recent paper, it was demonstrated that the popular legend that scissors can cut paper at super luminal speeds is indeed correct. In this comment we make this additional observation that when theExpand
Lorentz transformations with arbitrary line of motion
Sometimes it becomes a matter of natural choice for an observer (A) that he prefers a coordinate system of two-dimensional spatial x–y coordinates from which he observes another observer (B) who isExpand
A constructive formulation of the one-way speed of light
A formulation of the one-way speed of light in three-dimensional Euclidean space is derived by a constructive approach. This formulation is consistent with the result of the Michelson–MorleyExpand
Thomas rotation and Mocanu paradox -- not at all paradoxical
Non-commutativity of the Einstein velocity addition, in case of non-collinear velocities, seemingly gives rise to a conflict with reciprocity principle. However, Thomas rotation comes at a rescue andExpand

References

SHOWING 1-7 OF 7 REFERENCES
Reversal in time order of interactive events: Collision of inclined rods
In the rod and hole paradox as described by Rindler (1961 Am. J. Phys. 29 365-6), a rigid rod moves at high speed over a table towards a hole of the same size. Observations from the inertial framesExpand
The rod and hole paradox re-examined
In the rod and hole paradox as described by Rindler (1961 Am. J. Phys. 29 365–6) ('length contraction paradox'), a rigid rod moves at high speed over a table towards a hole of the same size. AExpand
Length Contraction Paradox
A certain man walks very fast—so fast that the relativistic length contraction makes him very thin. In the street he has to pass over a grid. A man standing at the grid fully expects the fast thinExpand
Length paradox in relativity
The apparent self‐contradictions of special relativity in thought experiments, where a body is intended to traverse a slit, do not have so simple a solution when that object is three‐dimensional asExpand
Computer simulation of Rindler's length contraction paradox
Three versions of the relativistic length contraction paradox are considered. A package of computer programs is used to make small animated graphics sequences that illustrate what happens in theExpand
Lorentz contraction
  • Am . J . Phys .
  • 1967
Physical proof of Einstein ’ s relativity failure