Differentiating Categories and Dimensions: Evaluating the Robustness of Taxometric Analyses

@article{Ruscio2009DifferentiatingCA,
  title={Differentiating Categories and Dimensions: Evaluating the Robustness of Taxometric Analyses},
  author={John Ruscio and Walter Kaczetow},
  journal={Multivariate Behavioral Research},
  year={2009},
  volume={44},
  pages={259 - 280}
}
Interest in modeling the structure of latent variables is gaining momentum, and many simulation studies suggest that taxometric analysis can validly assess the relative fit of categorical and dimensional models. The generation and parallel analysis of categorical and dimensional comparison data sets reduces the subjectivity required to interpret results by providing an objective Comparison Curve Fit Index (CCFI). This study takes advantage of developments in the generation of comparison data to… 
Using the Comparison Curve Fix Index (CCFI) in Taxometric Analyses: Averaging Curves, Standard Errors, and CCFI Profiles
TLDR
A series of simulation studies examine the use of the CCFI to flesh out some empirically supported guidelines and find that constructing a CCFI profile can help to differentiate categorical and dimensional data and provide a less biased and more precise estimate of the taxon base rate than conventional methods.
Direct and Conceptual Replications of the Taxometric Analysis of Type A Behavior
TLDR
Direct and conceptual replications of the influential taxometric analysis of Type A Behavior suggest theoretical models of TAB, assessment practices, and data analytic procedures that assume a typology should be replaced by dimensional models, factorial subscale measures, and corresponding statistical approaches.
Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.
TLDR
An approach to consistency testing is presented that builds on prior work demonstrating that parallel analyses of categorical and dimensional comparison data provide an accurate index of the relative fit of competing structural models.
Dimensions over categories: a meta-analysis of taxometric research
TLDR
The meta-analytic findings support the conclusion that the great majority of psychological differences between people are latently continuous, and that psychopathology is no exception.
Differentiating categorical and dimensional data with taxometric analysis: are two variables better than none?
TLDR
As long as high-quality data are available, it appears that one can have confidence in the results of taxometric analyses performed with only 2 variables, and the potential utility of 2- variables is illustrated using data on proactive and reactive childhood aggression.
Using comparison data to differentiate categorical and dimensional data by examining factor score distributions: resolving the mode problem.
TLDR
Performing parallel analyses of categorical and dimensional comparison data and calculating an index of the relative fit of these competing structural models achieves much greater accuracy, improved base rate estimation, and afforded consistency checks with other taxometric procedures.
A taxometric exploration of the latent structure of hoarding.
TLDR
The present investigation examined the latent structure of hoarding in three, large independent samples and provided converging evidence that hoarding is best conceptualized as a dimensional construct, present in varying degrees in all individuals.
Taxometric Analysis
  • J. Ruscio
  • Psychology
    Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology
  • 2021
Whether individual differences are treated as categorical or continuous has consequences for theory, assessment, classification, and research in criminal justice. Paul Meehl's (1995) taxometric
A contemporary taxometric analysis of the latent structure of self-monitoring.
TLDR
Dimensional findings indicate that the conventional model of self-monitoring may merit reexamination, and that theoretical models, measurement practices, and data analytic procedures that assume taxonicity should be replaced by dimensional conceptualizations and corresponding statistical procedures.
Unicorns, snarks, and personality types: A review of the first 102 taxometric studies of personality
  • N. Haslam
  • Psychology
    Australian Journal of Psychology
  • 2019
Objective The default assumption among most psychologists is that personality varies along a set of underlying dimensions, but belief in the existence of discrete personality types persists in some
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 40 REFERENCES
Robustness of Taxometric Analysis with Skewed Indicators: II. A Monte Carlo Study of the Maxcov Procedure
TLDR
Analysis of constructed data sets containing three levels of skew indicated that the MAXCOV procedure is unlikely to yield spurious findings of taxonicity even when skewness is considerable, however, care must be taken to distinguish low base-rate taxonic variables from skewed nontaxonic variables.
Taxometric Analysis: II. Detecting Taxonicity Using Covariance of Two Quantitative Indicators in Successive Intervals of a Third Indicator (Maxcov Procedure)
TLDR
Given three quantitative indicators of a conjectured latent taxon, a statistical function defined as the covariance of two indicators computed within successive intervals along the third indicator reveals whether the latent structure of the data is taxonic or not.
Bootstraps taxometrics. Solving the classification problem in psychopathology.
  • P. Meehl
  • Psychology
    The American psychologist
  • 1995
TLDR
Two taxometric procedures, MAMBAC and MAXCOV-HITMAX, provide independent tests of the taxonic conjecture and satisfactorily accurate estimates of theTaxon base rate, the latent means, and the valid and false-positive rates achievable by various cuts.
Can sample-specific simulations help detect low base-rate taxonicity?
TLDR
The authors speculate that examination of low base-rate taxa using SSS may require other algorithms for generating comparison distributions, consideration of the shape of the whole curve, and/or relaxation of the expectation that a clear peak will emerge with the inchworm test.
Taxometric analysis. I: Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure)
TLDR
Given two quantitative indicators of a conjectured latent taxon, a statistical function defined as the difference between the observed means for cases of one indicator falling above and below a sliding cut indicates whether the latent structure is taxonic or nontaxonic.
Bootstrapping to test for nonzero population correlation coefficients using univariate sampling.
TLDR
The authors suggest that the OI is preferable in alpha control to parametric approaches if the researcher believes the population is nonnormal and wishes to test for nonzero rhos of moderate size.
An Analysis of Meehl's MAXCOV-HITMAX Procedure for the Case of Continuous Indicators
TLDR
It is proved that, for the case of continuous indicators, Meehl's Hypothesis is false and results are developed analytically on the behaviour of the conditional covariance functions produced by taxonic structures.
An Analysis of Meehl's MAXCOV-HITMAX Procedure for the Case of Dichotomous Indicators
TLDR
The current work investigates whether (R1) and (R2) are true for the case of dichotomous indicators, and whether certain unexceptional Rasch structures, for example, producing single-peaked curves are true.
Clarifications about taxometric method
...
...