Differentials, higher-order differentials and the derivative in the Leibnizian calculus

  title={Differentials, higher-order differentials and the derivative in the Leibnizian calculus},
  author={Henk J. M. Bos},
  journal={Archive for History of Exact Sciences},
  • H. Bos
  • Published 1 March 1974
  • Mathematics
  • Archive for History of Exact Sciences

Leibniz versus Ishiguro: Closing a Quarter Century of Syncategoremania

Did Leibniz exploit infinitesimals and infinities à la rigueur or only as shorthand for quantified propositions that refer to ordinary Archimedean magnitudes? Hidé Ishiguro defends the latter

Proofs and Retributions, Or: Why Sarah Can’t Take Limits

The small, the tiny, and the infinitesimal (to quote Paramedic) have been the object of both fascination and vilification for millenia. One of the most vitriolic reviews in mathematics was that

Leibniz’s Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond

Many historians of the calculus deny significant continuity between infinitesimal calculus of the seventeenth century and twentieth century developments such as Robinson’s theory. Robinson’s

Historical infinitesimalists and modern historiography of infinitesimals

. In the history of infinitesimal calculus, we trace innovation from Leibniz to Cauchy and reaction from Berkeley to Mansion and beyond. We explore 19th century infinitesimal lores, including the


The way Leibniz applied his philosophy to mathematics has been the subject of longstanding debates. A key piece of evidence is his letter to Masson on bodies. We offer an interpretation of this often

Procedures of Leibnizian infinitesimal calculus: an account in three modern frameworks

Recent Leibniz scholarship has sought to gauge which foundational framework provides the most successful account of the procedures of the Leibnizian calculus (LC). While many scholars (e.g. Ishiguro,

Gregory’s Sixth Operation

AbstractIn relation to a thesis put forward by Marx Wartofsky, we seek to show that a historiography of mathematics requires an analysis of the ontology of the part of mathematics under scrutiny.

Leibniz�s well-founded fictions and their interpetations

Leibniz used the term fiction in conjunction with infinitesimals. What kind of fictions they were exactly is a subject of scholarly dispute. The position of Bos and Mancosu contrasts with that of

Interpreting the Infinitesimal Mathematics of Leibniz and Euler

Abstract We apply Benacerraf’s distinction between mathematical ontology and mathematical practice (or the structures mathematicians use in practice) to examine contrasting interpretations of

Almost Equal: the Method of Adequality from Diophantus to Fermat and Beyond

We analyze some of the main approaches in the literature to the method of ‘adequality’ with which Fermat approached the problems of the calculus, as well as its source in the παρισότης of Diophantus,



La Notion de Différentielle dans l'Enseignement

Poincaré, dans sa conférence prononcée au Musée pédagogique de Paris en 1904, déclarait déjà qu'ily avait lieu de penser en dérivées non en différentielles. II me semble utile pour l'enseignement de

Non-standard analysis

* General Introduction * Tools from Logic * Differential and Integral Calculus * General Topology * Functions of a Real Variable * Functions of a Complex Variable * Linear Spaces * Topological Groups