Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces

@article{Golby2001DifferentialRI,
  title={Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces},
  author={Alexandra J. Golby and John D. E. Gabrieli and Joan Y. Chiao and Jennifer L. Eberhardt},
  journal={Nature Neuroscience},
  year={2001},
  volume={4},
  pages={845-850}
}
Many studies have shown that people remember faces of their own race better than faces of other races. We investigated the neural substrates of same-race memory superiority using functional MRI (fMRI). European-American (EA) and African-American (AA) males underwent fMRI while they viewed photographs of AA males, EA males and objects under intentional encoding conditions. Recognition memory was superior for same-race versus other-race faces. Individually defined areas in the fusiform region… 
The Fusiform Face Area Plays a Greater Role in Holistic Processing for Own-Race Faces Than Other-Race Faces
TLDR
It is suggested that the right FFA plays a greater role in holistic processing of individual own-race faces than other- race faces, and that the neural composite effect observed in theright FFA is not the exact neural counterpart of the behavioral face composite effect.
Own-Race Faces Capture Attention Faster than Other-Race Faces: Evidence from Response Time and the N2pc
TLDR
Investigating whether there is an Own-Race Advantage in attention and its neural correlates suggested that own-race faces capture attention more efficiently than other- race faces.
Neural Correlates Involved in Processing Happy Affect on Same Race Faces
Neuroimaging studies have shown that the face-related regions of the brain, including the amygdala and the fusiform gyrus, are activated when subjects viewed the faces of their own race as compared
Implicit Distinction of the Race Underlying the Perception of Faces by Event-Related fMRI
TLDR
Results suggest that different activation in the fusiform regions and right parahippocampal gyrus resulting from superiority of same-race memory could have implicitly taken place by the physiological processes of face recognition.
Cognitive control, attention, and the other race effect in memory
TLDR
The results suggest that group-based face memory biases at least partially stem from differential allocation of cognitive control and top-down attention during encoding, such that same-race memory benefits from elevated top- down attentional engagement with face processing regions; conversely, reduced recruitment of Cognitive control circuitry appears more predictive of memory failure when encoding out-group faces.
Neural perspectives on the other-race effect
Psychological studies have long shown that human memory is superior for faces of our own-race than for faces of other-races. In this paper, we review neural studies of own- versus other-race face
Can perceptual expertise accountfor the own-race bias in face recognition? A split-brain study
TLDR
Data from a split-brain patient indicates that the own-race bias in facial recognition may be tied to functions lateralised in the right cerebral hemisphere, and these findings are discussed in relation to stimulus familiarity and the development of perceptual expertise.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 62 REFERENCES
Performance on Indirect Measures of Race Evaluation Predicts Amygdala Activation
TLDR
The results suggest that amygdala and behavioral responses to Black-versus-White faces in White subjects reflect cultural evaluations of social groups modified by individual experience.
Neural substrates for the recognition of newly learned faces: a functional MRI study
Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup vs ingroup face stimuli
TLDR
It is concluded that researchers seeking to study brain responses to face stimuli in human subjects should consider the relationship between the race of subjects and stimuli as a significant potential source of variance.
The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception
TLDR
The data allow us to reject alternative accounts of the function of the fusiform face area (area “FF”) that appeal to visual attention, subordinate-level classification, or general processing of any animate or human forms, demonstrating that this region is selectively involved in the perception of faces.
Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.
TLDR
The results are largely consistent with the hypothesis that expertise is associated with greater use of configural information in faces, and a larger own race inversion effect was found for recognition accuracy.
Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects
TLDR
Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure changes associated with increasing expertise in brain areas selected for their face preference, and evidence is presented that expertise recruits the fusiform gyrus 'face area'.
The Role of the Fusiform Gyrus in Successful Encoding of Face Stimuli
TLDR
The data suggest an expanded mnemonic role for the right midfusiform in depth of processing/encoding of face information, temporal polar cortex in face perception and recognition, and anterior fusiform activity in featural visual feature processing.
Development of differential recognition for own- and other-race faces.
TLDR
Although the youngest children recognized both kinds of faces equally well, recognition accuracy for Caucasian faces was superior to that for Oriental faces among older subjects, and females at college level were clearly superior to males at recognizing faces.
Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition
TLDR
It is suggested that level of categorization and expertise, rather than superficial properties of objects, determine the specialization of the FFA.
...
...