Differential characters and geometric invariants

@inproceedings{Cheeger1985DifferentialCA,
  title={Differential characters and geometric invariants},
  author={Jeff Cheeger and James Simons},
  year={1985}
}
This paper first appeared in a collection of lecture notes which were distributed at the A.M.S. Summer Institute on Differential Geometry, held at Stanford in 1973. Since then it has been (and remains) the authors' intention to make available a more detailed version. But, in the mean time, we continued to receive requests for the original notes. Moreover, the secondary invariants we discussed have recently arisen in some new contexts, e.g. in physics and in the work of Cheeger and Gromov on… 

From Sparks to Grundles--Differential Characters

We introduce a new homological machine for the study of secondary geometric invariants. The objects, called spark complexes, occur in many areas of mathematics. The theory is applied here to

Differential Characters for K-theory

We describe a sequence of results that begins with the introduction of differential characters on singular cycles in the seventies motivated by the search for invariants of geometry or more generally

Torsion in Cohomology Groups of Configuration Spaces

An important and surprising discovery in physics in the last fifty years is that if quantum particles are constrained to move in two rather than three dimensions, they can in principle exhibit new

Degeneration of Riemannian metrics under Ricci curvature bounds

These notes are based on the Fermi Lectures delivered at the Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, in June 2001. The principal aim of the lectures was to present the structure theory developed by Toby

A topological proof of Bloch's conjecture

The following is an outline of the structure of the thesis. • In the first chapter, after reviewing the Chern Weil construction of characteristic classes of bundles I introduce the constructions

SINGULARITIES AND CHERN-WEIL THEORY , II Geometric

This paper introduces a general method for relating characteristic classes to singu-larities of a bundle map. The method is based on the notion of geometric atomicity. This is a property of bundle

Perspectives on geometric analysis

This is a survey paper on several aspects of differential geometry for the last 30 years, especially in those areas related to non-linear analysis. It grew from a talk I gave on the occasion of

Lectures on Cohomology, T-Duality, and Generalized Geometry

These are notes for lectures, originally entitled “Selected Mathematical Aspects of Modern Quantum Field Theory”, presented at the Summer School “New Paths Towards Quantum Gravity”, Holbae k,

Analytic Topology

This is an extended written version of an address to the European Congress of Mathematics in Barcelona. It reviews my work of the last 10 years in Analytic Topology and contains several new theorems.

Hilbert’s 3rd Problem and Invariants of 3–manifolds

This paper is an expansion of my lecture for David Epstein’s birthday, which traced a logical progression from ideas of Euclid on subdividing polygons to some recent research on invariants of
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES

Homology Theory. By P. J. Hilton and S. Wylie. Pp. xv, 484. Reprint and first paper-back edition, 1967. Paper-back 22s. 6d. (Cambridge.)

To say tha t the going is often stiff is not to complain. The authors (12 in all) deal with their topics in depth; no one can afford to be slipshod about definitions and axioms and proofs in, say,

Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian Geometry. I

1. Introduction. The main purpose of this paper is to present a generalization of Hirzebruch's signature theorem for the case of manifolds with boundary. Our result is in the framework of Riemannian

A remark on the integral cohomology of BΓq

Characters and cohomology of finite groups

© Publications mathématiques de l’I.H.É.S., 1961, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Publications mathématiques de l’I.H.É.S. » (http://

Extensions and low dimensional cohomology theory of locally compact groups. II

Let A be an abelian locally compact(2) group and G an arbitrary: locally compact group. We shall say that A is a G-module (or a G-kernel) if¡ G operates continuously as a group of automorphisms of A.