Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials

@article{Wheeler2003DifferentRO,
  title={Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials},
  author={Mark Allen Wheeler and Michael Ewers and Joseph F Buonanno},
  journal={Memory},
  year={2003},
  volume={11},
  pages={571 - 580}
}
Two experiments investigated recall following two study conditions, (1) repeated test: a study trial followed by multiple recall trials, and (2) repeated study: multiple study trials with no tests. At a retention interval of 5 minutes, repeated study produced a higher level of recall than repeated test. When the retention interval was extended, forgetting was much more rapid in the study condition, with the repeated test manipulation leading to higher recall at an interval of 7 days. We… 

Testing can facilitate forgetting of tested items

TLDR
Results suggest that taking a test on a target item facilitates forgetting of the very same item for a short interval of time, a possible reason for the late appearance of the testing effect.

The effects of tests on learning and forgetting

TLDR
In three experiments, it is investigated whether memory tests enhance learning and reduce forgetting more than additional study opportunities do and whether testing enhanced overall recall more than restudying did.

Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.

TLDR
It is found that delayed relearning was faster for previously restudied items compared to previously tested items, and long-term retention benefits were found for items that were repeatedly tested compared to items that was repeatedly studied, regardless of item difficulty.

The Effects of Test Trial and Processing Level on Immediate and Delayed Retention

TLDR
Investigation of the effects of test trial and processing level on immediate and delayed retention showed that single test trial recalled more words than repeated test trial in immediate final free-recall test, and participants in deep processing performed better than those in shallow processing in both immediate and delay retention.

Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals

TLDR
This study focused on potential test-induced retention benefits for brief retention intervals on the order of minutes and tens of seconds in a bifurcated item-distribution model.

Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information.

TLDR
Results overall support the conclusion that repeated reactivation through testing or sleeping stabilizes information against forgetting, and find the advantage for restudied over retested information was greater in the PM than AM group.

Exploring the effect of testing on forgetting in vocabulary learning: an examination of the bifurcation model

ABSTRACT Research on the testing effect demonstrated a stronger decrease in performance for repeated studying compared to repeated testing. The bifurcation model attributes this test-delay

Test-Enhanced Learning

TLDR
Investigation of the testing effect with educationally relevant materials and whether testing facilitates learning only because tests offer an opportunity to restudy material concluded that testing is a powerful means of improving learning, not just assessing it.

Uncovering the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Learning from Tests

TLDR
While subsequent memory analyses of encoding trials also predict later accuracy, the brain regions involved in predicting later memory success are more extensive for activity during retrieval (testing) than during encoding (study).
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES

Some effects of remembering on forgetting

TLDR
It was concluded that the critical aspects of a test are the retrieval operations themselves, and suggestions are made as to how these operations attenuate forgetting.

A Comparison of Forgetting Rates in Older and Younger Adults

Two experiments investigated the rate of forgetting for recently learned information in older and younger adults. Previous research has been inconclusive, with some studies reporting more rapid

Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates.

Four experiments are reported that extend previous research and firmly demonstrate that item information is more susceptible to decay or interference than is associative information. The forgetting

The influence of retrieval on retention

TLDR
The results reject the hypothesis that a successful retrieval is beneficial only to the extent that it provides another study experience, as performing a memory retrieval (TTST condition) led to better performance than pure study (pure ST condition).

Observations On Comparing Rates of Forgetting : Comment on Loftus ( 1985 )

Loftus' (1985) proposal for comparing relative forgetting rates by evaluating the horizontal interaction, rather than by way of the standard vertical interaction, is critically scrutinized. It is

One Hundred Years of Forgetting : A Quantitative Description of Retention

A sample of 210 published data sets were assembled that (a) plotted amount remembered versus time, (b) had 5 or more points, and ( c j were smooth enough to fit at least 1 of the functions tested

Studies in retention.

The importance of retention is shown by the fact that growth or improvement in skills, knowledges, and attitudes is dependent upon the learner's retention of the effects of previous experience. The