• DOI:10.1080/10508619.2012.634778
• Corpus ID: 145173517

Differences in Attitudes Toward Outgroups in Religious and Nonreligious Contexts in a Multinational Sample: A Situational Context Priming Study

@article{LaBouff2012DifferencesIA,
  title={Differences in Attitudes Toward Outgroups in Religious and Nonreligious Contexts in a Multinational Sample: A Situational Context Priming Study},
  author={Jordan P. LaBouff and Wade C. Rowatt and Megan K. Johnson and Callie Finkle},
  journal={The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion},
  year={2012},
  volume={22},
  pages={1 - 9}
}

• Jordan P. LaBouff, W. Rowatt, +1 author C. Finkle
• Published 1 January 2012
• Psychology
• The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion

Researchers in the psychology of religion have begun utilizing priming methods to investigate the effects of the salience of religious concepts. These tightly controlled laboratory studies have demonstrated that priming religion may increase intergroup bias in both religious and nonreligious persons. The present study examined this possibility in a religiously and culturally diverse population using ecologically valid methods. Participants were recruited as they passed by either a religious or nonreligious structure in Western Europe. Participants in the religious context self-reported more negative attitudes toward non-Christian groups, more conservative political attitudes, and more personal religiousness and spirituality regardless of their personal belief in God. Results are discussed in terms of intergroup bias and salience of religious norms and stereotypes across cultures.