Did Jefferson or Madison understand Condorcet's theory of social choice?

@article{McLean1992DidJO,
  title={Did Jefferson or Madison understand Condorcet's theory of social choice?},
  author={Iain McLean and Arnold B. Urken},
  journal={Public Choice},
  year={1992},
  volume={73},
  pages={445-457}
}
ConclusionWe therefore conclude that, despite their contacts with Condorcet, neither Jefferson nor Madison understood his exposition of social choice. We have examined all the known primary documents which appear to bear on the question, none of which shows any hint that either Jefferson or Madison understood the social choice components of Condorcet's work. This is so even though Jefferson was a close friend, intellectual soulmate, and collaborator with Condorcet. Madison, though less close to… 

The intellectual contribution of Condorcet to the founding of the US Republic 1785–1800

TLDR
It is argued here that Condorcet's “Jury Theorem” had an influence on Madison, in the crucial Federal decision of 1787, and may have been more pronounced on Jefferson, who based his views on debt, usufruct and economic growth on Condorcett's optimism as expressed in the Esquisse.

The strange history of social choice, and the contribution of the Public Choice Society to its fifth revival

The place of social choice research in academe, and specifically the role of the Public Choice Society and its successive leaders in promoting it, is reviewed. The first leaders of the Virginia

James Madison and the Spirit of Republican Self-Government: Madison and Jefferson: An Appeal to the People

On March 28, 1797, James and Dolley Madison began the journey from the United States capital at Philadelphia to the Madison family home at Montpelier, Virginia. Three and a half weeks earlier, on

Democracy Is Not Intrinsically Just

In Bertolt Brecht's glorious Communist propaganda play The Caucasian Chalk Circle , a character who is a mouthpiece for the author declares that ‘things belong to people who are good for them’. In

An Introduction to Social Choice

Social choice studies the differing implications of the concept of rationality (or transitivity) for individuals versus groups under specified conditions and the significance of these differences in

Democracy, justice and impartiality

Political agitators from Babeuf or even the Gracchi forward have championed democratization of political structures as a means toward democratization of economic holdings. It usually works, to some

Condorcet Winners and the Paradox of Voting: Probability Calculations for Weak Preference Orders

That individual preferences may he aggregated into a meaningful collective decision using the Condorcet criterion of majority choice is one of the central tenets of democracy. But that individual

Are Democratic and Just Institutions the Same

Democratic procedures and just social outcomes are clearly not the same thing. A majority of the electorate can easily vote for a politician or a party that promotes social injustice (Barry 1991b).

Justice and Democracy: Justice, democracy and public goods

It is a curious fact that in the voluminous literature produced over the last quarter century or so on the topic of social justice, the question what, if anything, justice has to say about the supply

Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and the Déclaration des Droits de L’Homme et du Citoyen

Thomas Jefferson lives, as John Adams said on July 4, 1826, a few hours after Thomas Jefferson died and a few hours before John Adams died. Among other things, he lives through his direct influence

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES

The art of political manipulation

In twelve entertaining stories from history and current events, a noted political scientist and game theorist shows us how some of our heroes we as well as ordinary folk have manipulated their

Condorcet's Theory of Voting

  • H. Young
  • Economics
    American Political Science Review
  • 1988
Condcrcet's criterion states that an alternative that defeats every other by a simple majority is the socially optimal choice. Condorcet argued that if the object of voting is to determine the “best”

Thomas Jefferson on the repudiation of public debt

Thomas Jefferson's theory of public debt repudiation illustrates both the normative and positive aspects of public debt repudiation. Using Jefferson's model, this paper attempts to reveal several

The Condorcet-Jefferson connection and the origins of social choice theory

This paper explores the relationship between Condorcet and Jefferson to gain insight into the early development of social choice theory. Jefferson does not seem to have read or understood Condorcet's

The Paradox of Voting and Congressional Rules for Voting on Amendments

  • W. Riker
  • Law
    American Political Science Review
  • 1958
Writers on parliamentary law frequently begin their essays by citing with approval Hatsell's famous observation that “… it is more material that there should be a rule to go by than what that rule is

Inventing America: Jefferson's Declaration of Independence

From one of America's foremost historians, Inventing America compares Thomas Jefferson's original draft of the According to all people would never, patented and secretary of the ideas throughout

The Heresthetics of Constitution-Making: The Presidency in 1787, with Comments on Determinism and Rational Choice

  • W. Riker
  • Art, Political Science
    American Political Science Review
  • 1984
One contemporary method of reconciling the conflict in methodology between determinism and indeterminism is the notion of rational choice, which allows for both regularities in behavior and artistic

The Theory of Committees and Elections.

I The Theory of Committees and Elections.- I. A Committee and Motions.- II. Independent Valuation.- III. Can a Motion be Represented by the same Symbol on Different Schedules?.- IV. A Committee using

The Strategy of Conflict.

I. Elements of a Theory of Strategy 1. The Retarded Science of International Strategy 2. An Essay on Bargaining 3. Bargaining, Communication, and Limited War II. A Reorientation of Game Theory 4.

Condorcet. From natural philosophy to social mathematics

TLDR
This book will be read widely by all those concerned with transplantation and dialysis, but the historian of medicine, who should preserve his contact with the modern medicine, must also know of its existence.