Dialectic, the Dictum de Omni and Ecthesis

  title={Dialectic, the Dictum de Omni and Ecthesis},
  author={Michel Crubellier and Mathieu Marion and Zo{\'e} McConaughey and Shahid Rahman},
  journal={History and Philosophy of Logic},
  pages={207 - 233}
In this paper, we provide a detailed critical review of current approaches to ecthesis in Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, with a view to motivate a new approach, which builds upon previous work by Marion & Rückert (2016) on the dictum de omni. This approach sets Aristotle’s work within the context of dialectic and uses Lorenzen’s dialogical logic, hereby reframed with use of Martin-Löf's constructive type theory as ‘immanent reasoning’. We then provide rules of syllogistic for the latter, and… 
6 Citations

Jules Vuillemin on the Aristotelian Notion of the Possible and the Master Argument

The main idea animating the present paper is that the general aim of debates, such as the one involving the notorious case of the Master Argument, is the ponderation of logical principles by

Plato’s Dialogues: Dialectic, Orality and Character

It is first argued that dialectic was a form of regimented debate, which grew out of public debates in Ancient Greece. A set of rules for dialectical bouts is then given and their meaning explained.

Introduction: Some Brief Historical and Philosophical Remarks

The present volume develops a new way of linking Constructive Type Theory (CTT) with dialogical logic by following these three complementary paths, as mentioned in the preface: A. The path

Dialogues, Reasons and Endorsement

The main aim of the present paper is to show that, if we follow the dialogical insight that reasoning and meaning are constituted during interaction, and we develop this insight in a dialogical

Local Reasons and Dialogues for Immanent Reasoning

In this chapter we will provide the logical framework of dialogues for immanent reasoning, the dialogical framework incorporating features of Constructive Type Theory and making explicit the players’



What is Aristotelian Ecthesis

I consider the proper interpretation of the process of ecthesis which Aristotle uses several times in the Prior analytics for completing a syllogistic mood, i.e., showing how to produce a deduction


Aristotle’s syllogistic, developed in Prior Analytics 1.1–22, contains an abundance of constructions of the type (or or ) . In some passages, however, several MSS have alternative constructions of

Aristotle on Universal Quantification: A Study from the Point of View of Game Semantics

In this paper we provide an interpretation of Aristotle's rule for the universal quantifier in Topics Θ 157a34–37 and 160b1–6 in terms of Paul Lorenzen's dialogical logic. This is meant as a

‘ΠΡΟΤΑΣΙΣ’ in Aristotle’s Prior Analytics

It has often been claimed that (i) Aristotle’s expression ‘protasis’ means ‘premiss’ in syllogistic contexts and (ii) cannot refer to the conclusion of a syllogism in the Prior Analytics . In this

Articulating Medieval Logic

Preface Introduction 1. An Overview of Aristotelian Logic as seen by Medieval Logicians 2. Aristotle's Proofs of Conversions and Syllogisms 3. Quantifying Predicates, Singular Term Predicates,

A Completed System for Robin Smith's Incomplete Ecthetic Syllogistic

EC is a nonexplosive ecthetic system which is shown to be sound and complete with respect to all valid syllogistic arguments with a consistent set of premises.

Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic

Aristotle was the founder not only of logic but also of modal logic. In the "Prior Analytics" he developed a complex system of modal syllogistic which, while influential, has been disputed since

The philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka

One of the world's most influential logicians, Jaakko Hintikka is a leading figure on the international philosophical scene. Here, he responds to his critics. The 27 critical and descriptive essays

Game Semantics and the Manifestation Thesis

  • M. Marion
  • Philosophy
    The Realism-Antirealism Debate in the Age of Alternative Logics
  • 2012
It is argued that Dummett’s Manifestation Argument fits game semantics, once some basic ideas concerning sense and force in the theory of meaning are reformulated and the second person standpoint is fully taken into account.

What is a syllogism?

If Eukasiewicz's treatment is to accommodate Aristotle’s distinction, he must both show that the distinction makes sense when interpreted as applying to conditionals and that this sense is such as to establish some connection between ostensive and per impossibile conditionals.