Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews

  title={Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews},
  author={Alex Pollock and Pauline Campbell and Caroline Struthers and Anneliese J Synnot and Jack S. Nunn and Sophie J Hill and Heather Goodare and Jacqui H Morris and Chris Watts and Richard Morley},
  journal={Journal of Health Services Research \& Policy},
  pages={245 - 255}
Objectives Involvement of patients, health professionals, and the wider public (‘stakeholders’) is seen to be beneficial to the quality, relevance and impact of research and may enhance the usefulness and uptake of systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of evidence and resources to guide researchers in how to actively involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. In this paper, we report the development of the ACTIVE framework to describe how stakeholders are involved in systematic reviews… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Lost in reviews: Looking for the involvement of stakeholders, patients, public and other non‐researcher contributors in realist reviews

The ways in which contributor involvement, including PPI, is documented within healthcare realist reviews published over the last five years are described, including nomenclature, nature of involvement, and reporting impact.

Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.

This new framework incorporates developments in complex intervention research published since the previous edition was written, and introduces a new emphasis on the importance of context and the value of understanding interventions as 'events in systems' that produce effects through interactions with features of the contexts in which they are implemented.

Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation

The overall goal is to improve the development of guidelines through meaningful and equitable multi-stakeholder engagement, and subsequently to improve health outcomes and reduce inequities in health.

Identification and Reporting of Patient and Public Partner Authorship on Knowledge Syntheses: Rapid Review

The findings add to the evidence that searching for coproduced research is difficult because of the diversity of terms used to describe patient and public partners, and the lack of consistent, detailed reporting about PPI.

Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group

JBI's guidance for knowledge user engagement in scoping reviews based on the expert opinion of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group is presented and specific guidance on how this can occur is offered.

Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects

There is growing evidence from randomised controlled trials of the effects of consumer engagement on the relevance and positive outcomes of health policy, research and services and consumers should continue to employ evidence-informed consumer engagement in their jurisdictions.

Valuing All Voices: refining a trauma-informed, intersectional and critical reflexive framework for patient engagement in health research using a qualitative descriptive approach

The revised Valuing All Voices Framework provides guidance for teams looking to employ trauma-informed approaches, intersectional analysis, and critical reflexive practice in the co-development of meaningful, inclusive, and safe engagement strategies.

Developing a Framework for Public Involvement in Mathematical and Economic Modelling: Bringing New Dynamism to Vaccination Policy Recommendations

The MEMVIE Framework is the first attempt to identify potential points of collaborative public contribution to modelling, but it requires further evaluation and refinement that is undertaking in a subsequent study.

Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions

This paper critically explores the methods for quantitative evidence synthesis of the effectiveness of sequential treatment options within a health technology assessment (HTA) or similar process and covers methods for developing summary estimates of clinical effectiveness or the clinical inputs for the cost-effectiveness assessment.

Effectiveness of interventions to support the transition home after acute stroke: a protocol for a systematic review

A comprehensive literature search is carried out based on a pre-defined search strategy to establish if, in comparison with usual care or other comparative active interventions, support services offered to patients as they transition from acute hospital, inpatient rehabilitation/ESD to home, can achieve better patient and / or process outcomes.



Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review

Information from a subset of papers judged to provide the best descriptions of stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews provide examples of different ways in which stakeholders have been involved in systematic review.

Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts

There is a great interest in rehabilitation to engage stakeholders in the research process, however, further evidence is needed to identify effective strategies for meaningful stakeholder engagement that leads to more useful research that positively impacts practice.

Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: knowledge transfer for policy and practice.

Various stakeholder engagement opportunities that are employed throughout the stages of conducting a systematic review to increase knowledge utilization within these audiences are described and discussed.

Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers’ perceptions

This systematic review reveals that strategies to improve the uptake of evidence from reviews and meta-analyses will need to overcome a wide variety of obstacles and can inform future approaches to enhancing systematic review uptake.

How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research

How researchers can involve patients when they are applying for research funding is discussed and some opportunities and pitfalls are considered.

Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

A framework for conducting a scoping study is outlined based on recent experiences of reviewing the literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems and it is suggested that a wider debate is called for about the role of the scoped study in relation to other types of literature reviews.

A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities

This is the first international systematic review to focus on the impact of PPI on the people involved in the process, highlighting the importance of optimising the context and processes of involvement, so creating the potential for PPI to impact positively on the research itself.

A systematic scoping review of the evidence for consumer involvement in organisations undertaking systematic reviews: focus on Cochrane

There was evidence of highly variable levels and types of consumer involvement within and beyond Cochrane, but limited evidence for what makes the most effective methods and levels of involving consumers in review production.

A New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

A flexible taxonomy is introduced called the 7Ps of Stakeholder Engagement and Six Stages of Research for identifying stakeholders and developing engagement strategies across the full spectrum of research activities.