Development and use of a taxonomy to carry out a systematic review of the literature on methods described to effect distal movement of maxillary molars.

@article{Atherton2002DevelopmentAU,
  title={Development and use of a taxonomy to carry out a systematic review of the literature on methods described to effect distal movement of maxillary molars.},
  author={G J Atherton and A-M. Glenny and Kevin O’Brien},
  journal={Journal of orthodontics},
  year={2002},
  volume={29 3},
  pages={
          211-6; discussion 195-6
        }
}
OBJECTIVE To devise a taxonomy for the assessment of the orthodontic literature on methods described to effect distal movement of maxillary molars, to test the taxonomy for inter-assessor reliability, and to use it to classify studies in a systematic review of the literature. DATA SOURCES Articles appearing in the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Angle Orthodontist, (British) Journal of Orthodontics, European Journal of Orthodontics, and the Journal of Clinical… 
Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting.
Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.
TLDR
It can be concluded that the IOA was more effective than the EOA to create distal movement of the maxillary first molars.
Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents.
TLDR
Ten studies, reporting data from 354 participants, were included in this review, the majority of which were carried out in a university dental hospital setting, and the quality of the studies was generally poor.
EFFECTS OF JONES JIG APPLIANCE IN MAXILLARY FIRST MOLAR DISTALIZATION
TLDR
Evaluated treatment effects of Jones jig appliance during class-II molar correction with a focus on the magnitude of maxillary first molar distalization, its tipping, extrusion and rotation as well as anchorage loss at premolar- incisor unit found that there was 5.30 mm space created between molar and premolar during 5.65 months.
Anchorage provided during intra-arch distal molar movement: a comparison between the Nance appliance and a fixed frontal bite plane.
TLDR
Because neither the NA nor FBP provided stable anchorage, a second treatment phase is recommended to reverse the anchorage loss after distal molar movement, and if molar distalization is planned in deep bite cases, the FBP is the Anchorage system of choice.
Extra-oral Appliances in Orthodontic Treatment.
TLDR
The mechanics and contemporary uses of headgear in orthodontics for primary care dentists and specialist Orthodontists are described and Clinicians using retraction headgear and protractionHeadgear should be familiar with their clinical indications, the potential problems and how these can be avoided.
EFFECTS OF DISTAL JET APPLIANCE IN CLASS-II MOLAR CORRECTION
TLDR
Evaluated treatment effects of Distal Jet Appliance during Class-II molar correction with a focus on the magnitude of Maxillary first molar distalization, its tipping, extrusion, rotation as well as anchorage loss at premolar-incisor unit showed that there was 3.88 mm space created during 7.11 months.
COMPARE THE RATIO OF BOLTON IN GROUP 1 MALOCCLUSION WITH NORMAL OCCLUSION
TLDR
In terms of gender there was no significant difference in the anterior, posterior and total ratio in the Bolton analyze, and the patients were in the period of permanent teeth and all the teeth from 6 to6 were fullygrown and morphormologically normal.
Distalizing maxillary molars – how do you do it?
TLDR
The various appliances that are available to clinicians are details, presenting the available evidence supporting the use of these various appliances and how molar distalization can be incorporated with other aspects of orthodontic care.
COMPARISON OF JONES JIG AND DISTAL JET MOLAR DISTALIZING APPLIANCES
TLDR
Distal jet appliance was found to be a more effective and predictable method for the maxillary first molar distalization through bodily translation with minimum tipping, extrusion, and rotation as well as anchorage loss.
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES
Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion.
  • J. F. Tulloch, W. Medland, O. Tuncay
  • Medicine
    American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
  • 1990
A systematic review of the relationship between overjet size and traumatic dental injuries.
TLDR
The aim of this study was to aggregate the risk of traumatic dental injury due to overjet using several published papers and performing a meta-analysis on the results, and it can be concluded that children with an overjet larger than 3 mm are approximately twice as much at risk of injury to anterior teeth than children with a overjet smaller than 3mm.
An Analysis of Papers Published in the British and European Journals of Orthodontics
TLDR
Despite the RCT being regarded as the ‘Gold Standard’ for the evaluation of therapeutic interventions and materials only six of such studies used this method, significant differences in the type, setting and subject of papers published in BJO and EJO between 1989 and 1993 were found.
Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites.
TLDR
Occlusal grinding in the primary dentition with/without the addition of an upper removable expansion plate, in the mixed dentition for those children who did not respond to grinding, was shown to be effective in preventing a posterior crossbite in thePrimary dentition from being perpetuated to the mixed and permanent dentitions.
The six keys to normal occlusion.
  • L. Andrews
  • Medicine
    American journal of orthodontics
  • 1972
Rapid Class II molar correction with an open-coil jig.