Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing.

@article{Frith2003DevelopmentAN,
  title={Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing.},
  author={Uta Frith and Chris D. Frith},
  journal={Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences},
  year={2003},
  volume={358 1431},
  pages={
          459-73
        }
}
  • U. Frith, C. Frith
  • Published 29 March 2003
  • Psychology, Biology
  • Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
The mentalizing (theory of mind) system of the brain is probably in operation from ca. 18 months of age, allowing implicit attribution of intentions and other mental states. Between the ages of 4 and 6 years explicit mentalizing becomes possible, and from this age children are able to explain the misleading reasons that have given rise to a false belief. Neuroimaging studies of mentalizing have so far only been carried out in adults. They reveal a system with three components consistently… 

Figures from this paper

Changes of brain activity in the neural substrates for theory of mind during childhood and adolescence
TLDR
It is considered that the age‐related brain activity observed in the present study may be associated with the maturation of the prefrontal cortex and the associated development of cognitive functions.
What makes the dorsomedial frontal cortex active during reading the mental states of others?
TLDR
It is argued that key psychological and behavioral aspects in mentalizing are closely associated with DMFC functions, including executive inhibition, distinction between self and others, prediction under uncertainty, and perception of intentions, all of which are important for predicting others' intention and behavior.
Towards a neurocognitive theory of mind: how control and reasoning processes contribute to adult mentalizing
TLDR
A neurocognitive account of ToM should describe a flexible system which adapts to the specific conceptual and contextual demands of the social world at that time, as well as identifying two accounts of control processes for ToM in vlPFC and dmPFC.
Functional activity and effective connectivity of the posterior medial prefrontal cortex during processing of incongruent mental states
TLDR
The findings suggest that the bilateral temporal cortex engages in the construction and adjustment of diverging mental states by encoding relevant environmental information and the pMPFC inhibits this stimulus‐bound processing which helps to compute discrepant mental states and process another's false belief decoupled from one's own perception of reality.
Influence of goals on observation of actions : functional neuroimaging studies
TLDR
Three experiments using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy volunteers were performed to clarify the involvement of brain regions in important components of the ToM capacity and the role of goals in the neural basis of mentalising is discussed.
Extensive Left Temporal Pole Damage Does Not Impact on Theory of Mind Abilities
TLDR
The finding suggests that, despite its consistently observed activation in neuroimaging studies involving ToM tasks, the left TP is not necessary for ToM reasoning, at least in nonverbal conditions and as long as its right counterpart is preserved.
Neurofunctional Correlates of Theory of Mind Deficits in Schizophrenia
TLDR
The issue of neurofunctional correlates of Theory of Mind deficits in schizophrenia is addressed by reviewing functional imaging studies of the past ten years comparing schizophrenia patients to healthy controls, and several differences in hemodynamic response between patients and controls were observed.
Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 210 REFERENCES
Interacting minds--a biological basis.
TLDR
Observations suggest that the ability to mentalize has evolved from a system for representing actions, and medial prefrontal regions are concerned with explicit representation of states of the self.
Modeling other minds
TLDR
Nine normal volunteers performed a ‘theory of mind’ task while their regional brain blood flow pattern was recorded using the PET [15O]H2O technique, suggesting that when inferential reasoning depends on constructing a mental model about the beliefs and intentions of others, the participation of the prefrontal cortex is required.
Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension
A PET Investigation of the Attribution of Intentions with a Nonverbal Task
TLDR
The data suggest that attribution of intentions to others is associated with a complex cerebral activity involving the right medial prefrontal cortex when a nonverbal task is used.
"Theory of mind" impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions.
TLDR
The theory of mind was investigated in patients with unilateral frontal lobe lesions and the ability to infer first- and second-order beliefs was tested by requiring subjects to listen to stories in which a protagonist acted upon a false belief.
Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex
Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns
TLDR
A functional neuroimaging study with positron emission tomography in which six healthy adult volunteers were scanned while watching silent computer-presented animations showed increased activation in association with mental state attribution in four main regions: medial prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, basal temporal regions, and extrastriate cortex.
Mind Reading: Neural Mechanisms of Theory of Mind and Self-Perspective
TLDR
Divergent neural activations in response to TOM and SELF suggest that these important differential mental capacities of human self-consciousness are implemented at least in part in distinct brain regions.
Dissociative methods in the study of frontal lobe function
TLDR
Results suggest that well-defined regions of frontal cortex - middorsolateral, midventrolateral, and dorsal anterior cingulate - have somewhat dynamic functions, adapting themselves to solution of a broad range of cognitive problems.
Pretending and believing: issues in the theory of ToMM
...
...