Development and evaluation of a computer-based medical work assessment programme

Abstract

BACKGROUND There are several ways to conduct a job task analysis in medical work environments including pencil-paper observations, interviews and questionnaires. However these methods implicate bias problems such as high inter-individual deviations and risks of misjudgement. Computer-based observation helps to reduce these problems. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the development process of a computer-based job task analysis instrument for real-time observations to quantify the job tasks performed by physicians working in different medical settings. In addition reliability and validity data of this instrument will be demonstrated. METHODS This instrument was developed in consequential steps. First, lists comprising tasks performed by physicians in different care settings were classified. Afterwards content validity of task lists was proved. After establishing the final task categories, computer software was programmed and implemented in a mobile personal computer. At least inter-observer reliability was evaluated. Two trained observers recorded simultaneously tasks of the same physician. RESULTS Content validity of the task lists was confirmed by observations and experienced specialists of each medical area. Development process of the job task analysis instrument was completed successfully. Simultaneous records showed adequate interrater reliability. CONCLUSION Initial results of this analysis supported the validity and reliability of this developed method for assessing physicians' working routines as well as organizational context factors. Based on results using this method, possible improvements for health professionals' work organisation can be identified.

DOI: 10.1186/1745-6673-3-35

Extracted Key Phrases

3 Figures and Tables

0100020003000200920102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

4,712 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 4,712 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Mache2008DevelopmentAE, title={Development and evaluation of a computer-based medical work assessment programme}, author={Stefanie Mache and Cristian Scutaru and Karin Vitzthum and Alexander Gerber and David Quarcoo and Tobias Welte and Torsten Thomas Bauer and Michael F. Spallek and A. Seidler and Albert Nienhaus and Burghard F. Klapp and David Alexander Groneberg}, journal={Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (London, England)}, year={2008}, volume={3}, pages={35 - 35} }