Development and Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale1

@article{Stewart2004DevelopmentAV,
  title={Development and Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale1},
  author={Michael G. Stewart and David L. Witsell and Timothy L. Smith and Edward M. Weaver and Bevan Yueh and Maureen t. Hannley},
  journal={Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery},
  year={2004},
  volume={130},
  pages={157 - 163}
}
OBJECTIVE: The study goal was to validate a disease-specific health status instrument for use in patients with nasal obstruction. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PATIENTS: The study consisted of a prospective instrument validation conducted at 4 academic medical centers with 32 adults with nasal septal deformity. METHODS: Prospective instrument validation occurred in 2 stages. Stage 1 was the development of a preliminary (alpha-version) instrument of potential items. Stage 2 was a test of the alpha… Expand
Adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale
TLDR
The Dutch version of the NOSE (NL-NOSE) demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity and is recommended as a validated instrument to measure subjective severity of nasal obstruction in Dutch adult patients. Expand
Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale for Greek Patients
TLDR
The Greek-NOSE questionnaire is a valid instrument with satisfactory internal consistency, reliability, reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness. Expand
Reliability and validity of the Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale
TLDR
The T-NOSE scale is a valid instrument with good internal consistency, reliability, reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness, and the magnitude of the effect of surgery was considered high. Expand
Reliability and validity of the Italian nose obstruction symptom evaluation (I-NOSE) scale
TLDR
The I-NOSE scale is a reliable, valid, self-administered, symptom-specific questionnaire; its application is recommended. Expand
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a quality of life questionnaire: the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire.
TLDR
The cross-cultural adaptation and validation process for the Nose questionnaire in the Portuguese language demonstrated to be valid and the NOSE-p proved to be applicable in Brazil. Expand
Psychometric and Clinimetric Validity of the Modified 25-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test
TLDR
The SNOT-25 is a valid instrument that can be used to assess rhinosinusitis disease burden including the impact on productivity and may be a better predictor of treatment decisions and outcomes. Expand
French Validation of the NOSE and RhinoQOL Questionnaires in the Management of Nasal Obstruction
TLDR
The French versions of both questionnaires appear to be as reliable, valid, and sensitive to change as the English versions, allowing assessment of nasal obstruction in all its dimensions. Expand
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Lithuanian-NOSE scale
TLDR
The L-NOSE questionnaire is a valid instrument with satisfactory reliability, validity, and responsiveness with good discriminant validity of questionnaire. Expand
The efficiency of Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale on patients with nasal septal deviation.
TLDR
NOSE scale that is well correlated with examination findings and computed tomography, is very useful tool to evaluate the effectiveness of pure septoplasty. Expand
Development and validity of the DyNaChron questionnaire for chronic nasal dysfunction
TLDR
DyNaChron, a questionnaire with 78 items divided into six domains and exploring both the physical and psychosocial repercussions of CND, was developed and tested, and is a well-structured questionnaire with a high degree of internal consistency and all properties needed to be used in research. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES
Psychometric and Clinimetric Validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (Snot-20)
TLDR
The psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20), a disease-specific, health-related quality-of-life measure for rhinosinusitis, was analyzed. Expand
The development of the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index.
TLDR
A comparison of the responses between patients with and without documented nasal or Sinus disease was used to verify that the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index is a valid measuring instrument for patients with sinus disease, and test-retest validity reveals reliability over time. Expand
Nasal septal surgery: evaluation of symptomatic and general health outcomes.
TLDR
The results support the use of disease-specific instruments to evaluate the outcome of septal surgery, and the generic quality-of-life measures such as the Nottingham health profile and general health questionnaire did not show significant improvement in quality of life. Expand
Outcomes of septoplasty
TLDR
Predictor analysis revealed that female gender and a history of previous nasal surgery predicted worse outcome, and measures of general health did not differ significantly from normative values at baseline and did not change after surgical intervention. Expand
Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results.
TLDR
Surgeons' appreciation of the types of septal deviation that do benefit from surgical correction falls short of desirable, and preoperative rhinomanometry data failed to prove useful in predicting the long-term surgical outcome. Expand
Assessment of patient's benefit from rhinoplasty.
TLDR
The aim of this study was to measure the benefit of rhinoplasty in an unselected group of patients who had undergone this procedure under the National Health Service (NHS), and the Nasal Symptom Questionnaire was used to assess nasal symptoms. Expand
Development and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in rhinoconjunctivitis
  • E. Juniper, G. Guyatt
  • Medicine
  • Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • 1991
TLDR
The RQLQ is likely to prove useful as a measure of health‐related quality of life in clinical trials in both rhinoconjunctivitis and rhinitis. Expand
Longitudinal sensitivity of generic and specific health measures in chronic sinusitis
TLDR
It is concluded that the disease-specific CSS was more sensitive to change than the SF-36 survey in patients following ethmoid sinus surgery. Expand
The importance of nasal airway resistance and nasal symptoms in the selection of patients for septoplasty.
TLDR
Rhinomanometry is necessary in the selection of patients for septal surgery because the patients whose NAR was higher than normal had more often unilateral nasal stuffiness, and a larger number of them were able to remember a nasal trauma. Expand
The efficacy of nasal septal surgery.
TLDR
All patients undergoing septal reconstruction at three major teaching hospitals in Vancouver during the years 1988 to 1990 were reviewed retrospectively and nasal packing did not significantly affect the outcome, therefore it is not felt nasal packing is necessary. Expand
...
1
2
3
...