Developing methods that really do value the ‘Q’ in the QALY

@article{Dolan2008DevelopingMT,
  title={Developing methods that really do value the ‘Q’ in the QALY},
  author={Paul Dolan},
  journal={Health Economics, Policy and Law},
  year={2008},
  volume={3},
  pages={69 - 77}
}
  • P. Dolan
  • Published 1 January 2008
  • Medicine, Political Science
  • Health Economics, Policy and Law
Abstract Most health economists recommend that improvements in health be valued by asking members of the general public to imagine themselves in different states of health and then to think about how many years of life they would give up or what risk of death they would be willing to accept in order to be in full health. In this paper, I argue that preferences are not a very good guide to future experiences and a more suitable way to value health is to ask people in different states of health… 

Are subjective well-being measures any better than decision utility measures?

TLDR
There is a call for expanded research into developing new tools for quantifying health-related quality of life that are more valid, more sensitive to changes in health status, and less biased.

Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research

TLDR
The results show that the role of experience reported in health valuation-related papers is frequently disregarded or, at most, minimised to the item of personal experience (present)—linked to self-reported health.

Does freedom make a difference?

TLDR
Investigating differences between measures of subjective well-being and of perceived capabilities in terms of their correlation with dimensions of health-related quality of life using panel data concerning a sample of 293 breast cancer and melanoma patients suggests that the measures capture quite different aspects of the patients’ welfare.

People in states worse than dead according to the EQ-5D UK value set: would they rather be dead?

TLDR
Though negative QALY-weights are not very common, they constitute a non-negligible part of health states in a Swedish population 65 years and older and are higher among women than men and increases with age.

A Qualitative Study of the Views of Health and Social Care Decision-makers on the Role of Wellbeing in Resource Allocation Decisions in the UK

TLDR
This project explored the opinions of a sample of UK decision-makers on the relevance of wellbeing and subjective wellbeing for resource allocation decisions within health and social care.

Subjective well-being and generic preference-based measures of health: an empirical contribution

TLDR
This study investigates the extent to which satisfaction with life and SF-6D values are responsive to objective changes in health and investigates ‘satisfaction with health’ as a possible measure of health outcome.

Valuing the economic benefits of complex interventions: when maximising health is not sufficient.

TLDR
There is a need for a more considered approach that can take account of the perceived value for non-health attributes for some complex interventions, including genetic services and tests.

HEDS Discussion Paper 11/07

TLDR
An alternative approach that uses happiness to weight the health states of two preference-based measures (EQ-5D and SF-6D) in a follow-up of a large hospital patient sample is investigated.

a of A Study of the Views of and Social Decision-makers on the Role of Wellbeing in Resource Allocation Decisions in the UK .

TLDR
This project explored the opinions of a sample of UK decision-makers on the relevance of wellbeing and subjective wellbeing for resource allocation decisions within health and social care.

Are Quality-Adjusted Life Years a Good Proxy Measure of Individual Capabilities?

TLDR
Questions are cast on the ability of QALYs to act as a reliable proxy measure of individuals’ capability as measured by the ICECAP-A index.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES

QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.

TLDR
The results from a systematic review of the literature suggest that QALY maximisation is descriptively flawed, and the social value of a health improvement seems to be higher if the person has worse lifetime health prospects and higher if that person has dependents.

Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states.

  • P. Dolan
  • Medicine, Political Science
    Medical care
  • 1997
TLDR
The model presented in this article appears to predict the values of the states for which there are direct observations and, thus, can be used to interpolate values for theStates for which no direct observations exist.

Do Nonpatients Underestimate the Quality of Life Associated with Chronic Health Conditions because of a Focusing Illusion?

  • P. UbelG. Loewenstein C. Jepson
  • Medicine, Psychology
    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
  • 2001
TLDR
It could not be established that a focusing illusion contributes significantly to the discrepancy in QOL ratings of patients and nonpatients.

The measurement of health related quality of life

TLDR
Inclusion of QoL measurement was to be the norm in therapeutic trials and in 1993 this journal published an editorial encouraging cardiologists to be more ready to understand and use them.

Sensitivity and perspective in the valuation of health status: whose values count?

TLDR
The results suggest that general population samples, using EQ-5D(index) values, may be more able to discriminate between patient groups than the patients themselves are.

Interpretations of Utility and Their Implications for the Valuation of Health

The term utility can be interpreted in terms of the hedonic experience of an outcome (experienced utility) or in terms of the preference or desire for that outcome (decision utility). It is this

The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model.

Utilities, preferences, and substantive goods

Abstract. People’s utility levels are meant to be measures of their well-being. Early utilitarians defined them in terms of people’s happiness. Modern economics defines them in terms of people’s