Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss.

  title={Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss.},
  author={Helen Heath and Sarah Cowley},
  journal={International journal of nursing studies},
  volume={41 2},
  • H. Heath, S. Cowley
  • Published 1 February 2004
  • Psychology
  • International journal of nursing studies

Figures and Tables from this paper

Grounded Theory in Practice: Novice Researchers’ Choice Between Straussian and Glaserian
Novice researchers face challenges in applying grounded theory and choosing between its two historical approaches—Glaserian and Straussian. Although much has been discussed regarding the differences
Adapting Grounded Theory in Qualitative Research: Reflections from Personal Experience
Grounded theory is one of the methodologies that have been widely used in qualitative research. However, researchers, especially inexperienced ones have not been sure about its use in the process of
The roots and development of constructivist grounded theory.
The differences among the various schools of GT lie in their overarching goals and their perspectives of the nature of reality, considering the alignment between the constructivist worldview and the field of nursing, CGT offers a valuable methodology for researchers in this area.
The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory
Constructivist grounded theory is a popular method for research studies primarily in the disciplines of psychology, education, and nursing. In this article, the authors aim to locate the roots of
Methods in Practice: Grounded Theory in Media Arts Education Research
ion; these are axial and selective coding... both are based on exploring the relationships and interrelationships between categories” (Dimmock & Lam, 2012, p. 197). Because of the variation between
A Novice Researcher’s First Walk Through the Maze of Grounded Theory: Rationalization for Classical Grounded Theory
Being new to grounded theory the onus to understand the methodology and the various versionscan be daunting.Learning and understanding the differences between grounded theories methodologies can be
(Re)Grounding grounded theory: a close reading of theory in four schools
The debate over what counts as theory has dominated methodological conversations in grounded theory research for decades. Four of the schools of thought in that debate – Glaserian, Straussian,
This paper explores the grounded theory method as one of the research strategies within a qualitative approach to research which is widely used in social sciences in areas such as sociology,
Confessions from a grounded theory PhD: experiences and lessons learnt
An extended GT study on understanding why practitioners choose particular usability evaluation methods is described, and seven practical and methodological considerations in applying GT in a CHI context are drawn out.
The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory 1 .
It is the paper published as: Author: J. Mills, A. Bonner and K. Francis Title: The development of constructivist grounded theory Journal: International Journal of Qualitative methods ISSN: 1609-4069


Axial Coding and the Grounded Theory Controversy
  • J. Kendall
  • Psychology
    Western journal of nursing research
  • 1999
The author proposes a resolution to the controversy surrounding the use of axial coding by suggesting that one does not need to view either approach as right or wrong; rather, the qualitative and grounded theory researcher can choose an approach, and that choice is based on the goal of the researcher’s study.
Rediscovering Glaser
This article seeks to shed some light on the difference of opinion that has developed between the cooriginators of the grounded theory approach to qualitative data analysis. The author has worked
Grounded Theory Methodology
The originators of the grounded theory approach to qualitative research now disagree on certain procedural aspects of the methodology, while agreeing on others, and dispute its epistemological
Grounded theory method, Part II: Options for users of the method.
  • M. Annells
  • Environmental Science
    Nursing inquiry
  • 1997
Five broad options regarding multiple possible modes of grounded theory method are suggested and detailed, and the inquirer is not limited to the two major modes usually presented and discussed in the literature.
The use of literature in grounded theory
Unlike most approaches to research, grounded theory requires that literature is not reviewed before commencing a research study because to do so could lead the researcher into making misconceived
Methodological issues in grounded theory.
This paper identifies and attempts to address four key issues, namely, sampling, creativity and reflexivity, the use of literature, and precision within grounded theory.
Grounded theory as feminist research methodology.
This paper discusses how grounded theory could be used in a creative and constantly evolving manner for feminist research.
The variety of qualitative research. Part two: Non-positivist approaches.
Method slurring: the grounded theory/phenomenology example.
The authors discuss the importance of specificity in methodology and distinguish between phenomenology and grounded theory, two frequently misused terms in the description of qualitative methodology.
Evolution of a grounded theory: Conflict resolution through culture brokering
  • M. Jezewski
  • Sociology
    ANS. Advances in nursing science
  • 1995
The culture brokering theory can guide the practice of nurses in situations where conflict is present in the health care interaction and is grounded in the experiences of nurses attempting conflict resolution in the context of health care interactions.