Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting

  title={Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting},
  author={Peter Drahos},
  journal={The Journal of World Intellectual Property},
  • P. Drahos
  • Published 2005
  • Political Science
  • The Journal of World Intellectual Property
Some developing countries are arguably worse off than in the past. During the Cold War, least-developed counties (LDCS) had the benefit of India and Brazil’s leadership of a broad coalition of developing countries, a coalition that mainly expressed itselfin the form of the Group of 77 (G77). The G77 has faded in importance. It is also not clear that India and Brazil are prepared to provide the general leadership on intellectual property issues that they once did. In part, this is because some… Expand
Developing Country Coordination in International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting
International intellectual property (IP) standard-setting is becoming more complex and diversified. However, many developing countries are not well prepared to face the challenges arising from thisExpand
Intellectual property rights for developing countries: Lessons from Iran
Recent years have witnessed a heated debate about the need to overhaul the Iranian intellectual property system in both academic and policymaking circles. However, a close scrutiny of the debatesExpand
Building Intellectual Property Coalitions for Development
  • Peter K. Yu
  • Political Science
  • 2008
The adoption of the WIPO Development Agenda in October 2007 has provided less developed countries with a rare and unprecedented opportunity to reshape the international intellectual property systemExpand
African Union Rising to the Need for Continental IP Protection? The Establishment of the Pan-African Intellectual Property Organization
Abstract Intellectual property rights protection is at the forefront of some of the major controversies regarding the impact of globalization. African countries have in recent years participated toExpand
South-South Collaboration for an Intellectual Property Rights Flexibilities Agenda
This article analyses South-South initiatives for building an intellectual property (IP) flexibilities agenda, highlighting the particularities in this specific area of international relations asExpand
An offer developing countries could not refuse: how powerful states created the World Trade Organisation
Drawing on Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall’s concept of institutional power, this article presents the empirically ascertained asymmetries created by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) toExpand
State capacity and intellectual property regimes: Lessons from South American soybean agriculture
Abstract In the 1980's, the U.S. government started a global upward ratchet of intellectual property (IP) protection, demanding countries reform their IP regimes increasing the scope and strength ofExpand
Is Compliance Enough: Can the Goals of Intellectual Property Rights Be Achieved in South Africa?
Patent applications by South African residents significantly lag behind non-residents both at home and abroad. South Africa, at least in terms of its legislation, is compliant with the Trade RelatedExpand
Aid, trade and taboo: the place of indigenous traditional knowledge in development strategies: a Pacific perspective
Pacific island countries (PICs) are examples of some of the least developed nations in the world. To improve their economic performance they are being urged to enter various trade agreements and inExpand
Intellectual Property Provisions of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements in Light of U.S. Federal Law
During the past several years, the United States has concluded a substantial number of bilateral and regional free trade agreements (hereinafter “FTAs”), largely with developing countries. Each ofExpand