Corpus ID: 22388550

Determinants of judgments of explanatory power: Credibility, Generalizability, and Causal Framing

@article{Colombo2017DeterminantsOJ,
  title={Determinants of judgments of explanatory power: Credibility, Generalizability, and Causal Framing},
  author={Matteo Colombo and Leandra Bucher and Jan Sprenger},
  journal={Cognitive Science},
  year={2017},
  pages={1806-1811}
}
This study investigates how judgments of explanatory power are affected by (i) the prior credibility of a potential explanation, (ii) the causal framing used to describe the explanation, and (iii) the generalizability of the explanation. We found that the prior credibility of a causal explanation plays a central role in explanatory reasoning: first, because of the presence of strong main effects on judgments of explanatory power, and second, because of the gate-keeping role prior credibility… Expand
1 Citations
How deep do we dig? Formal explanations as placeholders for inherent explanations
TLDR
A new way in which explanations do their psychological work is suggested: not via their literal content (as assumed by prior work on explanation), but rather via the additional inferences they encourage. Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
Explanatory Judgment, Probability, and Abductive Inference
Abductive reasoning assigns special status to the explanatory power of a hypothesis. But how do people make explanatory judgments? Our study clarifies this issue by asking: (i) How does theExpand
Harry Potter and the sorcerer's scope: latent scope biases in explanatory reasoning
TLDR
It is shown that individuals prefer narrow latent scope explanations—those that account for fewer unobserved effects—to broader explanations, and what this novel bias tells us about how humans evaluate explanations and engage in causal reasoning is considered. Expand
Explanations Versus Applications
TLDR
It is demonstrated that applying either scientific or religious beliefs to explain other observations increases the perceived value of those beliefs, whereas generating explanations for the existence of beliefs decreases their perceived value. Expand
Explanation and categorization: How “why?” informs “what?”
TLDR
The findings suggest that a feature's explanatory importance can impact categorization, and that explanatory relationships, in addition to causal relationships, are critical to understanding conceptual representation. Expand
The structure and function of explanations
  • T. Lombrozo
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2006
TLDR
The study of explanation promises to shed light on core cognitive issues, such as learning, induction and conceptual representation, and presents a challenge to theories that neglect the roles of prior knowledge and explanation-based reasoning. Expand
Explanatory Judgment, Moral Offense and Value-Free Science
TLDR
The present study provides direct evidence that the moral offensiveness of a scientific hypothesis biases explanatory judgment along several dimensions, even when prior credence in the hypothesis is controlled for. Expand
Simplicity and probability in causal explanation
  • T. Lombrozo
  • Mathematics, Medicine
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • 2007
TLDR
Four experiments investigate the hypothesis that simpler explanations are judged both better and more likely to be true, and suggest that simplicity is used as a basis for evaluating explanations and for assigning prior probabilities when unambiguous probability information is absent. Expand
The Instrumental Value of Explanations
Scientific and ‘intuitive’ or ‘folk’ theories are typically characterized as serving three critical functions: prediction, explanation, and control. While prediction and control have clearExpand
Scientific Explanation And The Sense Of Understanding*
Scientists and laypeople alike use the sense of understanding that an explanation conveys as a cue to good or correct explanation. Although the occurrence of this sense or feeling of understanding isExpand
Information Becomes Evidence when an Explanation Can Incorporate It into a Causal Framework.
Abstract Recognizing information as evidence is central to the development of scientific reasoning. When does information about an event come to be treated as evidence relevant to explaining theExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...