• DOI:10.1142/S0217751X21300088
• Corpus ID: 74872233

Detection techniques and investigation of different neutrino experiments

@article{Nath2018DetectionTA,
  title={Detection techniques and investigation of different neutrino experiments},
  author={Ankur Nath and Ng. K. Francis},
  journal={International Journal of Modern Physics A},
  year={2018},
  volume={36},
  pages={2130008}
}

• A. Nath, Ng. K. Francis
• Published 23 April 2018
• Physics
• International Journal of Modern Physics A

Neutrino physics is an experimentally driven field. So, we investigate the different detection techniques available in the literature and study the various neutrino oscillation experiments in a chronological manner. Our primary focus is on the construction and detection mechanisms of each experiment. Today, we know a lot about this mysterious ghostly particle by performing different experiments at different times with different neutrino sources, viz. solar, atmospheric, reactor, accelerators and high-energy astrophysical; and they have contributed in the determination of neutrino parameters. Yet the problems are far from over. We need to determine more precise values of the already known parameters and unravel the completely unknown parameters. Some of the unknowns are absolute masses of neutrino, types of neutrino, mass hierarchy, octant degeneracy and existence of leptonic CP phase(s). We analyze the neutrino experiments into the past, present and the future (or proposed). We include SNO, Kamiokande, K2K, MINOS, MINOS+, Chooz, NEMO and ICARUS in the past; while Borexino, Double Chooz, Super-K, T2K, IceCube, KamLAND, NO[Formula: see text]A, RENO and Daya Bay in the present; and SNO+, Hyper-K, T2HK, JUNO, RENO-50, INO, DUNE, SuperNEMO, KM3NeT, P2O, LBNO and PINGU in the proposed experiments. We also discuss the necessities of upgrading the present ones to those of the proposed ones thereby summarizing the potentials of the future experiments. We conclude this paper with the current status of the neutrinos.