Detection and Learning of Floral Electric Fields by Bumblebees

@article{Clarke2013DetectionAL,
  title={Detection and Learning of Floral Electric Fields by Bumblebees},
  author={Dominic J Clarke and Heather M. Whitney and Gregory P Sutton and Daniel Robert},
  journal={Science},
  year={2013},
  volume={340},
  pages={66 - 69}
}
Flowers and Bees Have “Sparks” Plants and their pollinators have very intimate interactions, as emphasized by the many classic cases of coevolution among species of each. Such close relationships require signaling between plant and pollinator. Coordination between plant signals and pollinator perception has been shown to exist in flower color, shape, and odor. Clarke et al. (p. 66, published online 21 February) report the potential for a distinct mode of plant–pollinator communication, electric… Expand
Associative learning of flowers by generalist bumble bees can be mediated by microbes on the petals
TLDR
It is suggested that the study of communication in mutualism generally would benefit by considering not only the multicellular eukaryote partners, but their microbial associates, as they potentially facilitate dynamic communication between plants and pollinators such as bumble bees. Expand
Electric field detection as floral cue in hoverfly pollination
TLDR
The previously unappreciated capacity of hoverflies to detect the electric field surrounding flowers is presented and it is revealed that rapid variations in a floral electric field were related to a nectar reward and increased the likelihood of the fly’s return visits. Expand
The diversity of floral temperature patterns, and their use by pollinators
TLDR
It is shown that bumblebees can distinguish artificial flowers differing in temperature patterns comparable to those seen in real flowers, and floral temperature patterns may represent a new floral cue that could assist pollinators in the recognition and learning of rewarding flowers. Expand
Chapter Nine – Plant–Pollinator Communication
TLDR
Selective attraction of pollinators and deterrence of flower antagonists by means of specific signals, innate and learnt preferences of flower visitors as well as sensory exploitation make communication between flowers and pollinators a highly complex and diversified interaction. Expand
Bees Without Flowers: Before Peak Bloom, Diverse Native Bees Visit Insect-produced Honeydew Sugars
TLDR
The widespread ability of native bees to locate and use unadvertised, non-floral sugars suggests unappreciated sensory mechanisms and/or the existence of a social foraging network among solitary bees that may influence how native bee communities cope with increasing environmental change. Expand
Bees without Flowers: Before Peak Bloom, Diverse Native Bees Find Insect-Produced Honeydew Sugars
TLDR
The widespread ability of native bees to locate and use unadvertised, nonfloral sugars suggests unappreciated sensory mechanisms and/or the existence of an interspecific foraging network among solitary bees that may influence how native bees cope with scarcity of floral resources and increasing environmental change. Expand
The bee, the flower, and the electric field: electric ecology and aerial electroreception
TLDR
Focussing on pollen transfer, this article deconstructs some of the salient features of the three ingredients that enable electrostatic interactions, namely the atmospheric electric field, the capacity of bees to accumulate positive charge, and the propensity of plants to be relatively negatively charged. Expand
Bumblebees Learn Polarization Patterns
TLDR
Bumblebees can learn to discriminate between two differently polarized targets, but only when the target artificial “flower” is viewed from below, the first nonnavigational function for bee polarization vision to be identified. Expand
Report ion Patterns
Foraging insect pollinators such as beesmust find and identify flowers in a complex visual environment. Bees use skylight polarization patterns for navigation [1–3], a capacity mediated by theExpand
Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus
TLDR
This study opens a new area of research whereby the electrical charge of flying insects may provide information to plants on the presence and phenology of their pollinators, enabling plants to better ensure that their attractive chemical messages are released when a potential recipient is present. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES
Bidirectional Flower Color and Shape Changes Allow a Second Opportunity for Pollination
TLDR
Most flowers achieve pollination from one bee visit, but those with inadequate pollen receipt can reverse their signals, earning a "second chance" by eliciting attention from other potential pollinators. Expand
‘X’ marks the spot: The possible benefits of nectar guides to bees and plants
TLDR
Bees’ persistent response to patterned flowers even after rewards ceased suggests that, rather than being consistently mutually beneficial to plant and pollinator, nectar guide patterns can at times promote pollen transfer for the plant at the expense of a bee’s foraging success. Expand
Flowers help bees cope with uncertainty: signal detection and the function of floral complexity
SUMMARY Plants often attract pollinators with floral displays composed of visual, olfactory, tactile and gustatory stimuli. Since pollinators' responses to each of these stimuli are usually studiedExpand
Flowers as sensory billboards: progress towards an integrated understanding of floral advertisement.
  • R. Raguso
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Current opinion in plant biology
  • 2004
This paper explores the landscape of integrated sensory signals that are produced by flowers, and the contextual information that modulates pollinator responses to such signals. Chiloglottis orchidsExpand
Floral humidity as a reliable sensory cue for profitability assessment by nectar-foraging hawkmoths
TLDR
Because floral humidity gradients are largely produced by the evaporation of nectar itself, they represent condition-informative cues that facilitate remote sensing of floral profitability by discriminating foragers and should be adaptive when plant reproductive success is pollinator limited. Expand
Pollinator behaviour and natural selection for flower colour in Delphinium nelsonii
TLDR
Evidence is presented that discrimination occurs because white flowers have inferior ‘nectar guides’ and therefore require longer handling times than blue flowers, and pollinators may experience lower net rates of energy intake on white flowers, a sufficient reason for undervisitation by optimally-foraging animals. Expand
Floral Acoustics: Conspicuous Echoes of a Dish-Shaped Leaf Attract Bat Pollinators
TLDR
This work demonstrates how an unusual dish-shaped leaf displayed above the inflorescences of the vine Marcgravia evenia attracts bat pollinators by fulfilling requirements for an effective beacon, that is, they were strong, multidirectional, and had a recognizable invariant echo signature. Expand
The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees
TLDR
Honeybees may be using a less volatile chemical odour to detect whether flowers have recently been visited, possibly in addition to 2-heptanone, which was previously thought to use a volatile chemical as a repellent forage-marking scent. Expand
Mutations perturbing petal cell shape and anthocyanin synthesis influence bumblebee perception of Antirrhinum majus flower colour
TLDR
The results show that single mutations affecting flower signal can have profound effects on pollinator behaviour—but not in ways predictable by crude assessments via human perception, nor simple quantification of UV signals. Expand
Forget-me-not: Complex floral displays, inter-signal interactions, and pollinator cognition
TLDR
Functional hypotheses for why plants invest in complex floral plays are explored, focusing on hypotheses in which floral signals interact to promote pollinator learning and memory. Expand
...
1
2
3
...