• Corpus ID: 34888433

Designing for Civil Conversations: Lessons Learned from ChangeMyView

  title={Designing for Civil Conversations: Lessons Learned from ChangeMyView},
  author={Shagun Jhaver and Pranil Vora and Amy Bruckman},
Research has shown that people all over the world, and particularly Americans, are divided over many issues – from immigration and gun control to economic and foreign policy. Information bubbles further contribute to these divisions: People prefer to consume content they feel familiar with and see views they agree with. Yet, pluralism and viewpoint diversity are necessary for a well-functioning democracy. In this paper, we explore how we can design interfaces that dial down partisan antipathy… 

Tables from this paper

Someone Is Wrong on the Internet
A mixed-methods study with 257 participants suggests that although technology has the potential to support users during conflict, it is also rife with possibilities to do more harm than good by diluting users' intentions, intruding, or backfiring.
Subreddit R/unpopularopinion: Against the Spiral of Silence
This study introduces a descriptive study to show how the subreddit r/unpopularopinion helps its users to get over the spiral of silence.
Inclusion, equality and bias in designing online mass deliberative platforms
This work reviews the transdisciplinary literature on the design of digital mass-deliberation platforms and examines the commonly featured design aspects, finding that the literature is heavily focused on developing technical fixes for scaling up deliberation, with a heavy western influence on design and test users skew young and highly educated.
Designers of online deliberative platforms aim to counter the degrading quality of online debates and eliminate online discrimination based on class, race or gender. Support technologies such as
Making Online Communities 'Better': A Taxonomy of Community Values on Reddit
It is found that members value a broad range of topics ranging from technical features to the diversity of the community, and most frequently prioritize content quality, which identifies important understudied topics such as content quality and community size.
Leveraging Focus Theory of Normative Conduct to Shape User Behavior
Position Paper for the Workshop “Managing and Designing for Norms in Online Communities” at The International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) 2019 Abstract This paper argues that
Does Transparency in Moderation Really Matter?
It is suggested that removal explanations may be under-utilized in moderation practices, and it is potentially worthwhile for community managers to invest time and resources into providing them.
Content Removal as a Moderation Strategy
The causal role of comment deletion in reducing immediate noncompliance rates is revealed, although there is no evidence of it having a causal role in inducing other behavior improvements.
Persuasive language and features of formality on the r/ChangeMyView subreddit
The paper investigates formal language in persuasive discourse on the r/ChangeMyView subreddit. We collected a corpus of 100 million messages, split into subcorpora based on the user-awarded
Linking Theories of Motivation, Game Mechanics, and Public Deliberation to Design an Online System for Participatory Budgeting
Existing systems for online civic engagement and public consultation need a better architecture if they are to realize the aspirations of deliberative democracy. To improve the design of such


The Law of Group Polarization
In a striking empirical regularity, deliberation tends to move groups, and the individuals who compose them, toward a more extreme point in the direction indicated by their own predeliberation
Managing political differences in social media
Investigating political disagreements on Facebook to explore the conditions under which diverse opinions can coexist online found that participants who perceived more differences with their friends engaged less on Facebook than those who perceived less homogeneity.
Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions
It is shown that persuasive arguments are characterized by interesting patterns of interaction dynamics, such as participant entry-order and degree of back-and-forth exchange, and that stylistic choices in how the opinion is expressed carry predictive power.
Supporting reflective public thought with considerit
We present a novel platform for supporting public deliberation on difficult decisions. ConsiderIt guides people to reflect on tradeoffs and the perspectives of others by framing interactions around
Political Communication and Deliberation
This book is intended as a textbook in introductory political communication courses, especially those that focus on public deliberation. Like any textbook, it does more to survey than investigate its
Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media
We use national survey data to examine the extent to which various sources of political information expose people to dissimilar political views. We hypothesize that the individual’s ability and
Cyberville: Clicks, Culture, and the Creation of an Online Town
From the Publisher: Drawing on her own firsthand experiences with Echo and other online services she's visited, Stacy Horn will take you into the heart of today's global cybervillage by illuminating
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/DETOC/assoc/bowling.html 5/28/2012 Copyright © 1995 The National Endowment for Democracy and The Johns Hopkins University Press. Registered users of a subscribed
Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much
This work examines the relationship between the numbers of supporting and challenging items in a collection of political opinion items and readers' satisfaction, and evaluates whether simple presentation techniques such as highlighting agreeable items or showing them first can increase satisfaction when fewer agreeable items are present.
Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks.
Although considerable attitude similarity exists among friends, the results show that friends disagree more than they think they do, and the resulting gap between real and perceived agreement may have implications for the dynamics of political polarization and theories of social influence in general.