Denying Armageddon: Preventing Terrorist Use of Nuclear Weapons

  title={Denying Armageddon: Preventing Terrorist Use of Nuclear Weapons},
  author={Michael V. Hynes and John E. Peters and Joel S. Kvitky},
  journal={The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
  pages={150 - 161}
The United States can significantly reduce the likelihood of a nuclear terrorist attack if it pursues a vigorous, multilayered approach. Such an approach involves controlling nuclear technology and materials, manipulating the black market, and monitoring the behavior of aspiring nuclear actors. After analyzing each of these components, this article outlines the broad contours of a national preventative strategy that should give the nonproliferation community some cause for optimism. 

Figures from this paper

The deterrence of nuclear terrorism through an attribution capability
Abstract : The state of the world is such that the pace of nuclear weapons proliferation appears to be increasing. The growing number of nuclear states and amount of nuclear material available posesExpand
Dismantling Terrorism: Developing Actionable Solutions for Today's Plague of Violence
Abstract : This bibliography presents books, government documents, reports, and journal articles on various aspects of terrorism. The bibliography is divided into the following sections: causes andExpand
Bayesian network analysis of nuclear acquisitions
Bayesian Network Analysis of Nuclear Acquisitions. (August 2008) Corey Ross Freeman, B.S., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. William S. Charlton Nuclear weapons proliferationExpand


Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe
A call to action on the threat of nuclear terrorism predicts that a catastrophic attack is likely to occur within the next decade if policy makers continue present tactics, and states that such anExpand
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)
This material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect theExpand
How to Counter WMD
WORST PEOPLE VS. WORST WEAPONS PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH has rightly proclaimed that keep ing the worst weapons out of the hands of the worst people is Washington's highest national security priority.Expand
Comments at RAND presentation, September 22, Santa Monica, CA
  • ———. 2004b. Nuclear terrorism: The ultimate preventable catastrophe. New York: Times Books. Boutwell, Jeffrey, Francesco Calogero, and Jack Harris. 2002. Nuclear terrorism: The danger of highly
  • 2004
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Preventing and Defending against Clandestine Nuclear Attack
  • Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics
  • 2004
Reversing proliferation. The National Interest
  • 2004
Nuclear terrorism: The danger of highly enriched uranium
  • Pugwash Issue Brief
  • 2002
Explosive secrets
  • Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
  • 1999
The challenges of fissile material control
  • 1999
This declassification was made public in 1998. See also Albright and O'Neill
  • 1999