Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art

  title={Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art},
  author={David M. Godden and Frank Zenker},
  journal={Informal Logic},
Recent work on conditional reasoning argues that denying the antecedent [DA] and affirming the consequent [AC] are defeasible but cogent patterns of argument, either because they are effective, rational, albeit heuristic applications of Bayesian probability, or because they are licensed by the principle of total evidence. Against this, we show that on any prevailing interpretation of indicative conditionals, the premises of DA and AC arguments do not license their conclusions without additional… Expand

Figures from this paper

Denying the antecedent: The fallacy that never was, or sometimes isn't?
Abstract: In this paper we examine two challenges to the orthodox understanding of the fallacy of denying the antecedent. One challenge is to say that passages thought to express the fallacy canExpand
A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency
Results contrast with, and may indeed serve to correct, the informal understanding and applications of the RSA criteria concerning their conceptual (in)dependence, their function as update-thresholds, and their status as obligatory rather than permissive norms, but show how these formal and informal normative approachs can in fact align. Expand
Don’t worry, be gappy! On the unproblematic gappiness of alleged fallacies
The history of fallacy theory is long, distinguished and, admittedly, checkered. I offer a bird eye view on it, with the aim of contrasting the standard conception of fallacies as attractive andExpand


Denying the Antecedent: Its Effective Use in Argumentation
Denying the antecedent is an invalid form of reasoning that is typically identified and frowned upon as a formal fallacy. Contrary to arguments that it does not or at least should not occur, denyingExpand
Denying the Antecedent as a Legitimate Argumentative Strategy: A Dialectical Model
The standard account of denying the antecedent (DA) is that it is a deductively invalid form of argument, and that, in a conditional argument, to argue from the falsity of the antecedent to theExpand
Denying the Antecedent: A Common Fallacy?
An argumentative passage that might appear to be an instance of denying the antecedent will generally admit of an alternative interpretation, one on which the conditional contained by the passage isExpand
Logical fallacies as informational shortcuts
The paper argues that the two best known formal logical fallacies, namely denying the antecedent (DA) and affirming the consequent (AC) are not just basic and simple errors, which prove humanExpand
The logic of conditionals
The standard use of the propositional calculus ('P.C.’) in analyzing the validity of inferences involving conditionals leads to fallacies, and the problem is to determine where P.C. may be ‘safely’Expand
The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
Classical informal reasoning "fallacies," for example, begging the question or arguing from ignorance, while ubiquitous in everyday argumentation, have been subject to little systematic investigationExpand
Pragmatic Considerations in the Interpretation of Denying the Antecedent
In this paper I am concerned with the analysis of fragments of a discourse or text that express arguments suspected of being denials of the antecedent. I first argue that one needs to distinguishExpand
The Case for Psychologism in Default and Inheritance Reasoning
It is argued that ordinary people so cleverly and effortlessly use default reasoning to solve interesting cognitive tasks that nonmonotonic formalisms were introduced into AI, and this is a form of psychologism, despite the fact that it is not usually recognized as such in AI. Expand
Did Jesus Commit a Fallacy
Jesus has been accused of committing a fallacy (of denying the antecedent) at John 8:47. Careful analysis of this text (1) reveals a hitherto unrecognized valid fonn of argument which canExpand
Does the Traditional Treatment of Enthymemes Rest on a Mistake
In many actual arguments, the conclusion seems intuitively to follow from the premisses, even though we cannot show that it follows logically. The traditional approach to evaluating such arguments isExpand