Denial of the Armenian Genocide 100 Years Later: The New Practitioners and Their Trade

@article{Hovannisian2015DenialOT,
  title={Denial of the Armenian Genocide 100 Years Later: The New Practitioners and Their Trade},
  author={Richard G. Hovannisian},
  journal={Genocide Studies International},
  year={2015},
  volume={9},
  pages={228 - 247}
}
This essay assesses the several phases of denial from the time of the 1915 Armenian Genocide to the present, with emphasis on the most recent stage and contemporary deniers in the United States. The study analyzes their arguments and approaches, with particular attention on negationist assertions relating to intent and the claimed necessity of counterinsurgency measures against the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire. It gives numerous examples of the factual errors and fallacies in the… Expand
2 Citations
The Turkish-Armenian Historical Controversy: How to Name the Events of 1915?
Abstract: This article examines the debate involving Turkish and Armenian historiography about the fate of diverse Armenian communities in eastern Anatolia. It argues that the contemporaryExpand
Rhetorical Adaptation and Resistance to International Norms
Scholarship on states’ responses to international norms has focused on commitment, compliance, and noncompliance; paying insufficient attention to responses that fall outside these categories. BeyondExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES
Professional Ethics and the Denial of Armenian Genocide
This article examines Turkish efforts to deny the Armenian genocide of 1915-17. Specifically, it exposes an arrangement by which the government of Turkey has channeled funds into a supposedlyExpand
The Armenian file : the myth of innocence exposed
The myth that the ottoman empire's Armenian subjects were the innocent victims of wanton massacre has had a powerful hold. It is a myth that has served the interests of those countries who wanted toExpand
Orientalism, the ‘Terrible Turk’ and Genocide
This article examines the connections between Orientalism and the construction of the stereotypic image, the ‘terrible Turk.’ It focuses on the major politically motivated texts that were producedExpand
The Armenians and Ottoman Military Policy, 1915
Mainstream western scholarship maintains that the Armenian insurrection of 1915 was never an actual threat to the security of the Ottoman state in the First World War and that the relocation of theExpand
Sasun: The History of an 1890s Armenian Revolt
Sasun, a region of Anatolia formerly under Ottoman rule and today part of eastern Turkey, is frequently described as the site where, in 1894, the Turks massacred large numbers of Armenian Christians,Expand
The Young Turks' Crime against Humanity: The Armenian Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing in the Ottoman Empire
Preface ix Guide to Ottoman Turkish Words and Names xxxvii Abbreviations xxxix CHAPTER ONE Ottoman Sources and the Question of Their Being Purged 1 CHAPTER TWO: The Plan for the Homogenization ofExpand
Turkey: Ordered to Die: A History of the Ottoman Army in the First World War
Ordered to Die: A History of the Ottoman Army in The First World War, by Edward J. Erickson. Westport, CT and London, UK: Greenwood Press, 2001. xxii + 216 pages. Maps. Appends to p. 249. Sel. bibl.Expand
The Armenian Rebellion at Van
Before World War I, the ancient city of Van in southeastern Anatolia had a population of approximately 100,000 people, while the population of Van Province was about 500,000. Armenians formed a largeExpand
Armenian History and the Question of Genocide
The Historical Origins of the Turkish-Armenian Animosity What Is Genocide? Armenian Terrorism in the Twentieth Century Politicizing History Turkish Counterterror and Harassment? Rapprochement?
The Turk in America: Creation of an Enduring Prejudice
In "The Turk in America," historian Justin McCarthy seeks to explain the historical basis for American prejudice towards Turks in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The volume focuses onExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...