Democracy and Peace

  title={Democracy and Peace},
  author={Nils Petter Gleditsch},
  journal={Journal of Peace Research},
  pages={369 - 376}
  • N. P. Gleditsch
  • Published 1 November 1992
  • Political Science
  • Journal of Peace Research
The observation that democracies rarely if ever fight each other was made by Dean Babst nearly three decades ago, but has had little impact on the literature on peace research and international relations until recently. But now every volume of the leading journals contains articles on minor and major aspects of this theme. Professional jealousy and confusion of levels of analysis are possible explanations for the late acceptance of the idea of a democratic peace, but above all it seems to have… 


The idea that democratic states have not fought and are not likely to fight interstate wars against each other runs counter to the realist and neorealist theoretical traditions that have dominated

How Democracies Use Intervention: A Neglected Dimension in Studies of the Democratic Peace

Confidence has grown in the finding that democracies do not wage war against one another. Two decades of empirical investigation that support this proposition, in conjunction with the recent

The Umma of Democracy

This article challenges the democratic-peace literature to extend its scope by considering some of the underlying characteristics that might otherwise explain the absence of war between states. In

Targets of covert pressure: The hidden victims of the democratic peace

The expanding literature on the relationship between democracy and international conflict continues to focus on two questions: Are democracies inherently more peaceful than other forms of government?

Democratic Survival, Peace, and War in the International System

Post-World War II Western foreign policies are often based on the claim that the spread of democracy will result in global peace. Our understanding of how this propagation can bring about peace is

Military intervention and the democratic peace

The finding generated by numerous empirical investigations that democracies do not wage war against one another has inspired hope that the democratic “pacific union” envisioned by Immanuel Kant and

The Political Psychology of `Peace through Democratization'

Many scholars and policy-makers have pinned their hopes on the expectation that in the post-Cold War world peace will be preserved if the diffusion of democracy continues. This hope is grounded on

A Peace Dividend? Democracies' Military Interventions and Their External Political Consequences

Numerous empirical investigations have found that democracies do not wage war against one another. This finding has inspired hope that the rapid worldwide dispersion of democracy since the mid-1970s

Democracy and the Future of European Peace

No region equals Europe in the history of war and genocide. The question of war or peace in Europe is thus not just a regional but also a global concern. Since 1945, however, Europe has been

The Origins of UN Peacebuilding (I): The Academic Roots

  • F. Cavalcante
  • Political Science
    Peacebuilding in the United Nations
  • 2019
The chapter explores the different meanings of the concepts of liberal democracy and peace in (Western) international relations and political science academe. It contends that, separately, both



Do Democracies Fight each other? Evidence from the Peloponnesian War

The proposition that democracies rarely fight each other in the modern international system is increasingly accepted, and of great importance to theory and practice. Yet the reasons behind this

Democracy and War Involvement

Most quantitative researchers had agreed that regime type and war involvement are not significantly related to each other until Rummel recently challenged this consensus. According to Rummel,

Peace Between Participatory Polities: A Cross-Cultural Test of the “Democracies Rarely Fight Each Other” Hypothesis

Evidence is accumulating that, in the modern international system, democracies rarely fight each other. But the reasons for the phenomenon are not well understood. This article explores a similar

Democracy, War, and Covert Action

It is well established that stable industrialized democracies do not use overt force against each other. But do democracies ever use covert force against other elected governments? This article

Kant and Processes of Democratization: Consequences for Neorealist Thought

Does the spread of democracy present a bright future, with peace among nations? The theoretical foundation for expecting peace to flow from democracy was set forth by Immanuel Kant. According to the

Some Simple Calculations on Democracy and War Involvement

The empirical evidence on democracy and war involvement indicates two quite robust findings. First, democracies do not differ from other regimes in their degree of war involvement. Second, war is

Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific?

Realists have long viewed uneven rates of growth among states as a major cause of wars. According to strict logic of realpolitik, a declining dominant power should launch a preventive war against a

Democracy and War: Choice, Learning and Security Communities

The growing literature on the relationship between democracy and war has focused on two questions-Whether democracies are more pacific than other types of government, and why democracies do not seem

Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War.

Democracies are less likely to fight wars with each other. They are also more likely to prevail in wars with autocratic states. I offer an explanation of this syndrome of powerful pacifism drawn from

Libertarianism and International Violence

Based on theory and previous results, three hypotheses are posed: (1) Libertarian states have no violence between themselves. (2) The more libertarian two states, the less their mutual violence. (3)