Demarcating Science from Non-Science

  title={Demarcating Science from Non-Science},
  author={Martin Mahner},

Figures from this paper

The Demarcation between Philosophy and Science
This paper is based on a criterion recently proposed by Richard Fumerton for demarcating philosophy of mind and cognitive science. I suggest to extend it to a demarcation criterion between philosophy
Cicero's demarcation of science: A report of shared criteria.
Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion
Many philosophers have come to believe there is no single criterion by which one can distinguish between a science and a pseudoscience. But it need not follow that no distinction can be made: a
Mario Bunge (1919–2020): Conjoining Philosophy of Science and Scientific Philosophy
The leitmotif of Mario Bunge’s work was that the philosophy of science should be informed by a comprehensive scientific philosophy, and vice versa; with both firmly rooted in realism and materialism.
The demarcation of science is discussed in a wider context of differentiating the elements of scientific knowledge from non-scientific or pseudoscientific cognitive fields. The traditional
Ongoing Debate: How Can We Demarcate Science From Non-Science?
This paper deals with the demarcation problem in philosophy of science. In this context, I look for answers from logical positivists to Popper and to nowadays philosophers to the following questions:
Science, Religion, and Naturalism: Metaphysical and Methodological Incompatibilities
The debate about the relationship between science and religion shows no sign of abatement. Are science and religion in conflict? Are they just different? Or are they even complementary ways of
Controversy as a Blind Spot in Teaching Nature of Science
In this article, the argument is put forth that controversies about the scope and limits of science should be considered in Nature of Science (NOS) teaching. Reference disciplines for teaching NOS
The Role of Metaphysical Naturalism in Science
This paper defends the view that metaphysical naturalism is a constitutive ontological principle of science in that the general empirical methods of science, such as observation, measurement and
How Inclusive Is European Philosophy of Science?
The main question of this article is given by its title: how inclusive is European philosophy of science? Phrased in this way, the question presupposes that, as a mature discipline, philosophy of


The disorder of things : metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science
One of the main aims of philosophers and scientists throughout history has been to provide a complete account of the order of things. An articulation of such a dream in this century has been found in
A Philosopher looks at Astrology
AbstractProfessional astronomers and other scientists have often criticised astrology, although it is not their primary responsibility to tackle borderline subjects. It is rather the task of a
The Sociology-Philosophy Connection
Most social scientists and philosophers claim that sociology and philosophy are disjoint fields of inquiry. Some have wondered how to trace the precise boundary between them. Mario Bunge argues that
Whose nature of science
Science education literature explicitly and implicitly advocates basic tenets (criteria) for “the nature of science.” The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the science education tenets
The Unnatural Nature of Science
The seven sins of pseudo-science
SummaryIn this paper I will argue that a profile of the pseudo-sciences can be gained from the scientific pretensions of the pseudo-scientist. These pretensions provide two yardsticks which together
Naturalism, materialism and first philosophy
In the first section of this paper I define and defend a spatio-temporal account of the general nature of reality. I call this doctrine "Naturalism". In the second section I define and defend the
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?
My object in these pages is to juxtapose the view of scientific development outlined in my book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , with the better known views of our chairman, Sir Karl
Computational Philosophy of Science
By applying research in artificial intelligence to problems in the philosophy of science, Paul Thagard develops an exciting new approach to the study of scientific reasoning. He uses computational