Deliberating Competence

  title={Deliberating Competence},
  author={Jason Chilvers},
  journal={Science, Technology, \& Human Values},
  pages={421 - 451}
  • J. Chilvers
  • Published 1 May 2008
  • Science, Technology, & Human Values
The “participatory turn” cutting across technical approaches for appraising environment, risk, science, and technology has been accompanied by intense debates over the desired nature, extent, and quality of public engagement in science. Burgeoning work evaluating the effectiveness of such processes and the social study of science in society more generally is notable, however, for lacking systematic understanding of the very actors shaping these new forms science-society interaction. This paper… 

Tables from this paper

Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment
While the demands for greater engagement in science in general and regulatory science in particular have been steadily increasing, we still face limited understanding of the empirical resonance of
Unraveling the politics of ‘doing inclusion’ in transdisciplinarity for sustainable transformation
It is argued that by understanding ‘doing inclusion’ as a political practice, necessitating specificity about the (normative) ambitions in different inclusion settings, facilitators may better grasp and address challenges in transdisciplinarity for transformation.
How to normalize reflexive evaluation? Navigating between legitimacy and integrity
While hybrid evaluation practices are increasingly common, many Western countries continue to favor modernist evaluation logics focused on performance management—hampering the normalization of
Nuclear Citizens Jury: From Local Deliberations to Transboundary and Transgenerational Legal Dilemmas
ABSTRACT South Australia is home to one of the world’s largest uranium mines for export, but does not participate in further stages of the nuclear fuel cycle. In 2016, the Government of South
‘The biggest challenge is that we have to tell people how to sort.’ Waste management and the processes of negotiation of environmental citizenship in Slovenia
ABSTRACT This article departs from the concept of environmental citizenship. Focus is on the experiences of representatives for Slovenian municipal waste management companies and business sector
Exploring perceptions of environmental professionals, plastic processors, students and consumers of bio-based plastics: Informing the development of the sector
Abstract Bio-based plastics are produced from bio-based raw materials such as sugar cane, potatoes, corn, and agricultural and slaughterhouse waste. The evolution of the bio-based plastics market is


Challenging the 'view from nowhere': citizen reflections on specialist expertise in a deliberative process.
Analysis of citizen encounters with specialists in a deliberative process, called Deliberative Mapping, which explored options for addressing the shortage of organs for transplantation in the UK, presents evidence of how citizens located specialist expertise in making judgements about the legitimacy and credibility of specialist knowledge claims.
Upping the ante: A conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments
Radical uncertainty, political controversy and public distrust in emerging areas of science and technology is fuelling moves towards new forms of governance centred on ex ante or ‘upstream’ public
Towards Analytic‐deliberative Forms of Risk Governance in the UK? Reflecting on Learning in Radioactive Waste
While participatory forms of risk assessment and management have been the focus of much conceptualisation, experimentation, and evaluation, relatively less effort has gone into understanding how so
See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream
Spurred on by controversies over BSE, GM crops and nanotechnology, scientists gradually started to involve the public in their work. They looked first to education as the answer, then to processes of
Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes.
This critical review of the literature is used as the basis for developing general principles that can be used to guide the design and evaluation of public involvement processes for the health-care sector in particular.
Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal
This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost-benefit analysis and deliberative – participatory approaches to environmental policy.
The Politics of Talk
Talk of public dialogue and engagement has become fashionable internationally, and particularly within Europe. Building especially upon recent British experience, this paper argues that ‘public talk’
New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice, and Research
Appraisal—defined here to include a variety of ex ante techniques and procedures that seek to predict and evaluate the consequences of certain human actions—has been afforded an increasingly
Evaluating citizen advisory boards: the importance of theory and participant-based criteria and practical implications.
  • S. Santos, C. Chess
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
  • 2003
This study used two frameworks--one theoretical and one participant-based-to evaluate two U.S Army Restoration Advisory Boards (RABs), finding that the two RABs do not consistently foster the idealized aspects of fairness suggested by Habermas.
Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda
The concept of public participation is one of growing interest in the UK and elsewhere, with a commensurate growth in mechanisms to enable this. The merits of participation, however, are difficult to