Defining multiple criteria for meaningful outcome in routine outcome measurement using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales

@article{Parabiaghi2013DefiningMC,
  title={Defining multiple criteria for meaningful outcome in routine outcome measurement using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales},
  author={A. Parabiaghi and H. Kortrijk and C. Mulder},
  journal={Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology},
  year={2013},
  volume={49},
  pages={291-305}
}
  • A. Parabiaghi, H. Kortrijk, C. Mulder
  • Published 2013
  • Medicine
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • PurposeUsing the reliable and clinically significant change approach, we aimed to identify meaningful outcome indicators for the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) and to combine them in a single model. We applied these indicators to the 1-year outcome of two large samples of people attending community mental health services in Italy (cohort 1) and the Netherlands (cohort 2).MethodsData were drawn from two studies on routine outcome assessment. The criteria for meaningful outcome were… CONTINUE READING

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

    Treatment results for severe psychiatric illness: which method is best suited to denote the outcome of mental health care?
    • 2
    • Highly Influenced

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 52 REFERENCES
    Measuring Clinically Meaningful Change Following Mental Health Treatment
    • 91
    • PDF
    Modelling Candidate Effectiveness Indicators for Mental Health Services
    • 31
    • Highly Influential
    PQP3: DEFINING CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL CHANGE IN HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE
    • 256