Defining biological communication

@article{ScottPhillips2008DefiningBC,
  title={Defining biological communication},
  author={Thomas C. Scott-Phillips},
  journal={Journal of Evolutionary Biology},
  year={2008},
  volume={21}
}
Communication is ubiquitous in biology, and agreement on terms essential for scientific progress. Yet there is no agreed definition of biological communication. Definitions couched in terms of adaptation are often used, but there is significant variability in exactly which criteria are invoked. An alternative is to define communication in terms of information transfer. This article reviews the merits of these approaches, and argues that the former is to be preferred, so long as we demand that… 
Resolving current disagreements and ambiguities in the terminology of animal communication
TLDR
This work defines both influence and information explicitly and delineate between signalling, deceptive communication, and situations where perceivers respond to cues rather than signals.
C Communication
In humans, communication is one of those terms that everyone knows but may be a little more difficult for some of us to define. In animal communication, biologists have been arguing over the
Putting information back into biological communication
TLDR
It is concluded that information‐free approaches to communication are conceptually incomplete and operationally hindered, and a functional notion of information is proposed that follows logically from previous adaptationist accounts.
New problems for defining animal communication in informational terms
TLDR
It is argued that an information-mediated influence definition overextends to include most, indeed maybe all, co-adapted interactions, and that it swings things too far in the opposite direction: the authors go from a definition of communication that istoo liberal to one that is too restrictive.
Language and Communication
TLDR
This chapter discusses how human communication is ultimately a matter of mutually assisted mind reading and mental manipulation, what proximate mechanisms can explain why languages are structured in the way they are, and both proximate and ultimate explanations of the evolutionary stability of human communication.
Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Implications for the Origins of Linguistic Generativity
TLDR
It is argued that it is premature to conclude that the systems observed in non-human primates are evolutionarily related to language, and the results illustrate the value of an extremely broad approach to comparative research.
An Organisational Approach to Biological Communication
TLDR
A theoretical account of biological communication in which communicative functions are distinguished from other types of biological functions described by the organisational account, and allows to carry out causal analyses of current instances of phenomena of communication, without the need to provide etiological explanations.
A primer on information and influence in animal communication
“What is surprising is that, despite this intensive study, the whole subject [of animal communication] is extremely confused, largely because the definitions of the various terms that have been used.
HOW DO COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS EMERGE, AND WHAT DOES THIS TELL US ABOUT LANGUAGE?
Communication is not a trait possessed by one or another individual. Rather, it is an interaction between two or more individuals (Krebs & Dawkins, 1984; Maynard Smith & Harper, 2003; Scott-Phillips,
The evolution of communication: Humans may be exceptional
Communication is a fundamentally interactive phenomenon. Evolutionary biology recognises this fact in its definition of communication, in which signals are those actions that cause reactions, and
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
Evolution of Communication
TLDR
The two paradigms of communication are introduced, seen to be the extreme poles on a continuum, and it is concluded that traditional SP approaches are based on an ill-formed approach to communication.
Evolutionary theory of bacterial quorum sensing: when is a signal not a signal?
TLDR
This review seeks to integrate the evolutionary literature on animal signalling with the microbiological literature on QS, and asks whether QS within bacteria is true signalling or whether these molecules are also used as cues or for the coercion of other cells.
"Derived" Activities; Their Causation, Biological Significance, Origin, and Emancipation During Evolution
TLDR
An attempt at an explanation of certain types of behavior, many of them elements of threat, courtship, or other types of display, the origin of which has long been obscure, but is now gradually becoming known, based on knowledge of the nature of innate behavior.
Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection
TLDR
The aim here is to address issues of semantic confusion that have arisen with research on the problem of cooperation, and to emphasize the need to distinguish between proximate (mechanism) and ultimate (survival value) explanations of behaviours.
Cooperation—A Biologist's Dilemma
Genetical control of stability in development
TLDR
In dkEcious animals the decision between male and female development commonly depends on segregation of the X-Y difference, on whether the zygote is carrying XX or XY chromosomes, and in a few species the course of sexual development is switched by external causes.
Animal Signals: Models and Terminology
TLDR
Three classifications of signals are discussed, based on the type of information that they convey, the relationship between their form and that of the object, being signalled about, and the processes that maintain the reliability of the signal.
Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations
TLDR
This work examines the social evolution of QS experimentally in the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and shows that although QS can provide a benefit at the group level, exploitative individuals can avoid the cost of producing the QS signal or of performing the cooperative behaviour that is coordinated by QS, and can therefore spread.
Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions
TLDR
20 years of empirical and theoretical research on causes and functions of social influences on foraging by animals and the importance to the future of the field of integrating 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' approaches to the study of social learning is considered.
John Maynard Smith’s notion of animal signals
This paper explores John Maynard Smith’s conceptual work on animal signals. Maynard Smith defined animal signals as traits that (1) change another organism’s behaviour while benefiting the sender,
...
...