Defining Economics: The Long Road to Acceptance of the Robbins Definition

@article{Backhouse2009DefiningET,
  title={Defining Economics: The Long Road to Acceptance of the Robbins Definition},
  author={Roger E. Backhouse and Steven G. Medema},
  journal={Wiley-Blackwell: Economica},
  year={2009}
}
fields. Though often presented as self-evidently correct, both the definition itself and the developments that it has been used to support were keenly contested. This paper traces the reception, diffusion and contesting of the Robbins definition, arguing that this process took around three decades and that even then there was still significant dissent. 
A New View on Robbins's Definition of Economics: the Notions of Real and Formal Scarcity
Abstract This article analyses Robbins's famous definition of economics. It shows that this definition was introduced by the author to solve long-standing problems regarding the subject-matter of theExpand
Methodology in action
This essay addresses the question, raised by Frank Hahn, of whether the study, by economists, of economic methodology is in practice beneficial. After considering what this statement could mean, andExpand
The nature and significance of Lionel Robbins’ methodological individualism
Abstract Lionel Robbins’ definition of economics helped to buttress the centrality that individual choice acquired after the Second World War. This, however, was an unintended consequence of hisExpand
The convoluted influence of Robbins’s thinking on the emergence of Economics Imperialism
This article analyses the influence of Robbins’s thought on the subsequent development of economics imperialism. First, the analysis of some passages that have been overlooked up to the present, inExpand
Lionel Robbins on the principles of economic analysis – the 1930s lectures
For many, Lionel Robbins is the author of the best-known definition of economics as a science studying “human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses” ...
The Pluralism Debate in Heterodox Economics
The discourse in the pluralism debate in heterodox economics concludes that contested inquiry does not exist in economics and that heterodox economics is not an alternative to mainstream economics.Expand
Visions of Globalization: Inequality and Political Stability
Beginning with a literature review of globalization, economic inequality, and political stability, a series of quantitative models are presented to identify interweaving relationships. Using theExpand
Rationality and Beyond: A Critique of the Nature and Task of Economics
This paper shows that the means-end rationality principle, as an ‘ultimate given’ of economics, delimits the faculty of economists to observe, describe and understand the manifold human behavior.Expand
- 1-Economists and the rise of neo-liberalism
At the end of the Second World War, there was, outside the Soviet bloc, broad acceptance of the need for a mixed economy. There were differences over where to draw the line the private and publicExpand
Theorizing Scarcity
This article critically examines the neoclassical approach to scarcity as well as critiques of neoclassical economics that focus either on the formation of people’s wants (the demand side ofExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 124 REFERENCES
Live and dead issues in the methodology of economics
We attempt to clarify divisions made by us in previous work (Colander et al., 2004a; 2004b) between "orthodox, mainstream, and heterodox" in economics, following useful remarks in Dequech (2007-8),Expand
Lament for Economics
1. The Indictment2. The Relation of Economic theory to the Actual Economic World3. The Nature and Insignificance of Economic Science4. Economics as Apologetics?5. Economic Individualism, Old and NewExpand
IN DEFENSE OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS
Summary Against the background of a definition of institutional economics and in the light of the traditional critique directed against it the author outlines the main preoccupations and majorExpand
Scope and Method of Economics
THE object of the presidential address by Mr. R. F. Harrod to Section F (Economics) on method is threefold: (1) An attempt is made to show the kind of knowledge on which the practicalExpand
Advocacy versus Analysis in Economics
Methodological controversy in economics is anything but a recent phenomenon. Polemical exchanges concerning the nature of economics tend to flare sporadically and then ultimately perish, shrouded inExpand
The Political Economy of Opulence
“Economics is the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses.” Lionel Robbins' well-known definition of their subject is oneExpand
Lament for Economics
THE indictment is that “ the economic theory of to-day is useless because it is unintelligible ; because, after all their arduous studies, the economists cannot be relied upon not to giveExpand
Retrospectives : On the Definition of Economics
Modern economists do not subscribe to a homogeneous definition of their subject. Surveying definitions of economics from contemporary principles of economics textbooks, we find that economics is theExpand
WHY BOTHER WITH METHODOLOGY
This chapter discusses the promotion of the definition of methodology. The antipathy to methodology among a good many economists originated in the times when such discussions consisted mainly inExpand
The Methodology of Positive Economics
Milton Friedman's 1953 essay 'The methodology of positive economics' remains the most cited, influential, and controversial piece of methodological writing in twentieth-century economics. Since itsExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...