Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DANAMI 3-DEFER): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

@article{Kelbk2016DeferredVC,
  title={Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DANAMI 3-DEFER): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.},
  author={Henning Kelb{\ae}k and Dan Eik H\ofsten and Lars Valeur K\ober and Steffen Helqvist and Lene Kl\ovgaard and Lene Holmvang and Erik J\orgensen and Frants Pedersen and Kari I Saunam{\"a}ki and Ole De Backer and Lia Evi Bang and Klaus F. Kofoed and Jacob Thomsen L\onborg and Kiril A. Ahtarovski and Niels Grove Vejlstrup and Hans Erik B\otker and Christian Juhl Terkelsen and Evald H\oj Christiansen and Jan L Ravkilde and Hans Henrik Tilsted and Anton Boel Villadsen and Jens Aar\oe and Svend Eggert Jensen and Bent Raungaard and Lisette Okkels Jensen and Peter Michael Clemmensen and P. Grande and Jan Kyst Madsen and Christian Torp-Pedersen and Thomas Engstr\om},
  journal={Lancet},
  year={2016},
  volume={387 10034},
  pages={2199-206}
}
BACKGROUND Despite successful treatment of the culprit artery lesion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation, thrombotic embolisation occurs in some cases, which impairs the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of deferred stent implantation versus standard PCI in patients with STEMI. METHODS We did this open-label, randomised controlled trial at four primary PCI centres in… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 12 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
26 Citations
0 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 26 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…