Defending the piggyback principle against Shapiro and Sober’s empirical approach

@article{Baltimore2009DefendingTP,
  title={Defending the piggyback principle against Shapiro and Sober’s empirical approach},
  author={Joseph A. Baltimore},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2009},
  volume={175},
  pages={151-168}
}
Jaegwon Kim’s supervenience/exclusion argument attempts to show that non-reductive physicalism is incompatible with mental causation. This influential argument can be seen as relying on the following principle, which I call “the piggyback principle”: If, with respect to an effect, E, an instance of a supervenient property, A, has no causal powers over and above, or in addition to, those had by its supervenience base, B, then the instance of A does not cause E (unless A is identical with B). In… 
1 Citations
A Complete Bibliography of Publications in Synthese, 2020–2029
Abduction [336]. Abductive [11, 124]. ability [143]. Absence [188]. absences [233]. absurdity [154]. Acceptable [18]. accepting [120]. account [81, 169, 129, 13, 196, 168]. across [35]. Action [271,

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES
Mind in a Physical World
he elaborated his famous attacks to different kinds of non-reductive physicalism, including supervenient-based accounts. But it is only around 1993 that he begins to develop a model that replaces SC.
Thinking about causes : from Greek philosophy to modern physics
Emerging as a hot topic in the mid-twentieth century, causality is one of the most frequently discussed issues in contemporary philosophy. Causality has been a central concept in philosophy as well
A Theory of Conditionals
A conditional sentence expresses a proposition which is a function of two other propositions, yet not one which is a truth function of those propositions. I may know the truth values of “Willie Mays
Physicalism, or Something Near Enough
Can Supervenience and “Non‐Strict” Laws Save Anomalous Monism?
Epiphenomenalism - the do's and the don 'ts'
When philosophers defend epiphenomenalist doctrines, they often do so by way of a priori arguments. Here we suggest an empirical approach that is modeled on August Weismann’s experimental arguments
Making Things Happen
Davidson’s thinking causes
  • J. Heil & A. Mele (Eds.), Mental causation (pp. 41–50).
  • 1995
On Davidson ’ s response to the charge of epiphenomenalism
  • 1995
Mental events