Defending Abduction

  title={Defending Abduction},
  author={Ilkka Niiniluoto},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  pages={S436 - S451}
  • I. Niiniluoto
  • Published 1 September 1999
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
Charles S. Peirce argued that, besides deduction and induction, there is a third mode of inference which he called "hypothesis" or "abduction." He characterized abduction as reasoning "from effect to cause," and as "the operation of adopting an explanatory hypothesis." Peirce's ideas about abduction, which are related also to historically earlier accounts of heuristic reasoning (the method of analysis), have been seen as providing a logic of scientific discovery. Alternatively, abduction is… 

Eco and Peirce on Abduction

  • F. Bellucci
  • Philosophy
    European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy
  • 2018
This paper argues that Umberto Eco had a sophisticated theory of abductive reasoning and that this theory is fundamentally akin to Peirce’s both in the analysis and in the justification of this kind

A Comparison of Explanatory Measures in Abductive Inference

Computer simulations have been carried out to investigate the performance of two measures for abductive inference by comparing them with a third approach, Most Probable Explanation, and show that PCM tracks the results of MPE more closely than ML when the degree of competition is greater than 0 and hence is able to infer explanations that are more likely to be true under such a condition.

To Wish Impossible Things: On the Ontological Status of Latent Variables and the Prospects for Theory in Psychology

In this commentary, we argue that Fried's article, "Lack of theory building and testing impedes progress in the factor and network literature," provides a number of insights that will be very useful

Modeling creative abduction Bayesian style

This paper takes up the idea of combining creative abduction with causal principles and model instances of successful creative abduction within a Bayes net framework, and identifies necessary conditions for such inferences and investigates their unificatory power.

Explanatory Consolidation: From ‘Best’ to ‘Good Enough’

In science and everyday life, we often infer that something is true because it would explain some set of facts better than any other hypothesis we can think of. But what if we have reason to believe

IBE in engineering science - the case of malfunction explanation

This paper shows that, due to the intimate connection between explanation and redesign in engineering science, there is a further engineering domain-specific virtue in terms of which engineering malfunction explanations are evaluated, viz. the virtue of redesign utility.

Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) and Archaeology: Old Tool, New Model

The author concludes with a novel IBE-based model for recording archaeological argumentation, which is based on a model that has quietly existed for over a century.

Aggregates, Formational Emergence, and the Focus on Practice in Stone Artifact Archaeology

The stone artifact record has been one of the major grounds for investigating our evolution. With the predominant focus on their morphological attributes and technological aspects of manufacture,

Statistical reasoning in diagnostic problem-solving—The case of flow-rate measurements

The role of statistical techniques in diagnostic problem-solving and reasoning patterns that make the application of statistics powerful are discussed and the contribution to theory in statistics is not in the individual techniques but in their application and integration in a coherent sequence of studies – a reasoning strategy.

Conceptualising redundancy and flexibility towards supply chain robustness and resilience

Abstract As disruptions and uncertainty have become emergent themes within the supply chain literature, attention has shifted towards the choices enacted to combat the negative effects of



Abductive Reasoning: Logic, Visual Thinking, and Coherence

This paper discusses abductive reasoning—that is, reasoning in which explanatory hypotheses are formed and evaluated. First, it criticizes two recent formal logical models of abduction. An adequate

Discoverers' Induction

In this paper I demonstrate that, contrary to the standard interpretations, William Whewell's view of scientific method is neither that of the hypothetico-deductivist nor that of the retroductivist.

Truth and best explanation

Nowadays it is not uncommon to find claims to the effect that the notion of truth is ultimately an epistemic notion. Truth is accordingly said to depend on one’s viewpoint and background knowledge


Analogical reasoning is a traditional mode of argument which has been applied in a variety of contexts — such as rhetorics, ethics, politics, mythology, metaphysics, theology, mathematics, logic,

Antirealist Explanations of the Success of Science

  • A. Kukla
  • Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science
  • 1996
Scientific realists have argued that the truth(likeness) of our theories provides the only explanation for the success of science. I consider alternative explanations proposed by antirealists. I

The Varieties of Information and Scientific Explanation

The concept of information seems to be strangely neglected by epistemologists and philosophers of language, and philosophers’ attention is called to a few possibilities of correcting it.

Induction and Reasoning to the Best Explanation

In this paper I want to cast doubt on the claim that there is a legitimate process of reasoning to the best explanation which can serve as an alternative to either straightforward inductive reasoning

On Van Fraassen's Critique of Abductive Reasoning

Adoptant l'attitude critique propre a A. Menuge, l'A. montre que ni l'argument du mauvais lot, ni l'argument de l'indifference, ni la conception de la non-observabilite, developpes par Van Fraassen

What is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology

It is sometimes said that the highest philosophical gift is to invent important new philosophical problems. If so, Peirce is a major star on the firmament of philosophy. By thrusting the notion of

Theoretical concepts and hypothetico-inductive inference

1. Theoretical concepts and inductive Inference.- 1. Problems of Inductive Systematization: the Transitivity Dilemma.- 2. Inductive Systematization Established by Theories.- 3. A Logical Framework