Defending Abduction

@article{Niiniluoto1999DefendingA,
  title={Defending Abduction},
  author={Ilkka Niiniluoto},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={1999},
  volume={66},
  pages={S436 - S451}
}
  • Ilkka Niiniluoto
  • Published 1999
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Charles S. Peirce argued that, besides deduction and induction, there is a third mode of inference which he called "hypothesis" or "abduction." He characterized abduction as reasoning "from effect to cause," and as "the operation of adopting an explanatory hypothesis." Peirce's ideas about abduction, which are related also to historically earlier accounts of heuristic reasoning (the method of analysis), have been seen as providing a logic of scientific discovery. Alternatively, abduction is… CONTINUE READING

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 35 REFERENCES
    Abductive Reasoning: Logic, Visual Thinking, and Coherence
    • 199
    Discoverers' Induction
    • 13
    Truth and Best Explanation
    • 7
    ANALOGY AND SIMILARITY IN SCIENTIFIC REASONING
    • 47
    Antirealist Explanations of the Success of Science
    • A. Kukla
    • Philosophy
    • Philosophy of Science
    • 1996
    • 18
    The Varieties of Information and Scientific Explanation
    • 49
    • Highly Influential
    Induction and Reasoning to the Best Explanation
    • 45
    • PDF
    On Van Fraassen's Critique of Abductive Reasoning
    • 73