Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning

@article{TewdwrJones1998DeconstructingCR,
  title={Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning},
  author={Mark Tewdwr-Jones and Philip Allmendinger},
  journal={Environment and Planning A},
  year={1998},
  volume={30},
  pages={1975 - 1989}
}
What has becomes known in recent years as communicative or collaborative planning has forged a new hegemony in planning theory. Described by some as the paradigm of the 1990s, it proposes a fundamental challenge to the practice of planning that seeks both to explain where planning has gone wrong and (more controversially) to identify ways forward. The broad approach itself and advocates of it have lacked the advantage of any critique. This paper provides such an opportunity. Following a brief… 
The Communicative Turn in Urban Planning: Unravelling Paradigmatic, Imperialistic and Moralistic Dimensions
The emerging paradigm of communicative or collaborative planning has dominated theoretical discourse since the early 1980s. Rather than one coherent position, there are a variety of schools that vary
Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements?
This article argues that existing critiques of communicative planning become more salient when we consider the challenges posed by neoliberalization, which is understood here to mean the ongoing
Dilemmas in Critical Planning Theory
In this paper, it is argued that Critical Planning Theory is inadequate as a planning theory. It ought to search for the means to incorporate the principles of legitimate planning argumentation,
Counter-Hegemonic Movements? Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or
This article argues that existing critiques of communicative planning become more salient when we consider the challenges posed by neoliberalization, which is understood here to mean the ongoing
A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing discourses
After communicative planning theory emerged in the 1980s, challenging assumptions and prevailing theories of planning, debates ensued among planning theorists that led to apparently opposing groups
Consensus is Overrated: How Agonistic Pluralism and Radical Planning Challenges the Post-Political City
In light of the perceived failures of communicative planning within Australian cities, many urban scholars have argued that the theory of agonistic pluralism presents a viable alternative to our
Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’
Theories of urban democracy that are relevant, critical and take sufficient account of the pervasiveness of power continue to pose challenges. Two theoretical frameworks dominate in relation to
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES
Communicative micropolitics: A story of claims and discourses
Abstract This paper examines the communicative dynamics of the public sphere as represented in a public meeting about major strategic planning proposals in a metro‐politan area in Western Australia.
Foucauldian discourse: power and truth in the policy process
Abstract This paper explores the implications of Michael Foucault's work on discourse, knowledge and power for our understanding of the policy process, and for planning theory. A recurrent weakness
The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation
There is an increasing contemporary interest, particularly in Europe, in the spatial organization of urban regions and in spatial strategy. But there is a general loss of confidence in political
The Communicative Work of Development Plans
The author examines the contents of three recent British development plans to identify the systems of meaning (discourses) embodied within them. The objective is to illustrate the communicative work
Planning in the Face of Power.
Abstract Information is a source of power in the planning process. This article begins by assessing five perspectives of the planner's use of information: those of the technician, the incremental
Collaborative Action in Local Plan-Making: Planners' Perceptions of ‘Planning through Debate’
Community participation exercises in the development plan process in the United Kingdom have generally been undertaken by local authorities through a consultation process where planners draw up
Mind the Gap: Planning Theory–Practice and the Translation of Knowledge into Action—A Comment on Alexander (1997)
TLDR
It is argued that the problems of translating theory into practice are certainly a key element of the hiatus between theory and practice and, according to this view, the theory practice gap takes a significantly different appearance.
Habermas and Lyotard on postmodernity
In Knowledge and Human Interests Habermas tried to generalize what Marx and Freud had accomplished by grounding their projects of “unmasking” in a more comprehensive theory. The strand in
Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice
The long-bemoaned gap between theory and practice in planning is closing as a new type of planning theorist is beginning to dominate the field. These theorists make the gap complaint moot because
Beyond Dialogue to Transformative Learning: How Deliberative Rituals Encourage Political Judgment in Community Planning Processes
This paper explores the ways we learn about value in deliberative settings. In planning and many kinds of participatory processes more generally, such learning occurs not just through arguments, not
...
...